  mbnt
join:2002-06-22 Clifton, NJ 1 edit | reply to kamm Re: who cares?
Whatever. Posting replied on here is like talkin' to brick walls. Everyone's out to just flame each other. -- Unless you've seen KISS live, you don't understand the band. Paul Stanley, KISS. (2003). |
|
  cbrigante2 Cubs 20?? Premium join:2002-11-22 North Aurora, IL
| reply to RadioDoc said by RadioDoc :Not catering to 5% of the market? Big loss there... I thought I read that Apple now held closer to 10% of the market now somewhere? |
|
  jwsmiths4 Part Man, Part Mac Premium join:2003-10-25 Savannah, GA | reply to kamm You mean guaranteed? So was the iPod when that was launched  |
|
  MysticGogeta The Robot Devil Premium join:2005-03-14 League City, TX clubs:
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to AnonProxy Not really they figure people are ignorant to buy a iPod and pay 99 cents per song when there's other cheaper LEGAL music downloading company's out there, Then there ignorant enough to spend 10 bucks to say "Hey check this out I'm cool now with a rented IPod movie on my IPod video" If there's enough stupid people buying this to make a profit then they win and I'm pretty damn sure they will clean up on it. But hey there apple I guess that makes there business practice better then microsoft cause there the little guy but they do the same things. |
|
  insomniac84
join:2002-01-03 Schererville, IN
| reply to AnonProxy said by AnonProxy :A huge failure waiting to happen...iron out purchase agreements for $9.99 per move and I'm in. Are you nuts, $9.99 is the price of a full dvd with its quality and extra content. Just the barebones movie, try 5 bucks tops. |
|
 RadioDoc 58ef2c0 Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 | reply to mbnt Not catering to 5% of the market? Big loss there...  -- Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
  kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
| reply to xmrocks said by xmrocks :Maybe if you actually read my post, you would have read that I said I don't know of any other sites. Thanks for the flame! I'm sorry, it wasn't about flaming.  I just simply hate all of those false Apple-related urban legends and wnated to set the record straight.  |
|
  kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
4 edits | reply to mbnt said by mbnt :What an ignorant answer, those sites don't even cater to Mac users with their Windows Media DRM garbage. Umm look who's talking... the original statement was only about being first.
(BTW it'd be more than funny if somebody would proudly claim Apple did something first on OS X only. )
Besides that a single-digit market force like OS X doesn't really convince anybody to develop something specific for them - because the fact of the matter is Apple decided not to develop anything that would play WMV, only MS had put out some shitty-buggy beta for a while...
Talk about showing sheer ignorance... 
PS: WMV and WMVHD or VC-1 is far superior to anything Apple was able to come up - same or better quality with lower hw requirements, you know... |
|
  mbnt
join:2002-06-22 Clifton, NJ
| reply to kamm What an ignorant answer, those sites don't even cater to Mac users with their Windows Media DRM garbage. -- Unless you've seen KISS live, you don't understand the band. Paul Stanley, KISS. (2003). |
|
  xmrocks Premium,MVM join:2003-09-23 clubs:  
·Comcast
| reply to kamm Maybe if you actually read my post, you would have read that I said I don't know of any other sites.
Thanks for the flame! -- I don't tolerate phishing - >>phishtracker |
|
  sporkme drop the crantini and move it, sister Premium,MVM join:2000-07-01 Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online
| reply to AnonProxy said by AnonProxy :A huge failure waiting to happen...iron out purchase agreements for $9.99 per move and I'm in. "Apple's decision to implement a rental model for movies will be a major departure for the company and Jobs. Apple had been trying for months to persuade the movie studios that the a-la-carte model of buying individual titles, as the iTunes Music Store offers with music, was the way to go. The studios, however, have been fixed on offering only a subscription or rental-based model."
The movie studios are idiots.
The iTunes music store thrives even though many, many people still steal music. By giving consumers an option of buying movies online they are basically getting "Free" money that would normally be lost.
While I'm sure many here prefer piracy, there are always people that want to be legit, and currently no one wants to sell downloads to them.
If this rumor is true, I would have to imagine the other announcement is an iPod designed for movie viewing... -- Day dreaming days in a daydream nation |
|
  kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
1 edit | reply to xmrocks said by xmrocks :said by TKJunkMail :A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Agreed about the price. However, I still think it'll be a big success down the road. At first, I'm thinking iTunes/Apple will get slammed with criticism about it but still be a pioneer in that respect of bring movies to your desktop for a price (at least I know of know Mac-compatible sites for movie rentals/downloads at the current time though I'm sure there are Windows-based sites). And people will rent the movies -- that's the thing. I agree they'd be dummies for doing it, but I have a hunch it'll be successful. Call me crazy Ummm please, stop right here. Don't start another fake 'being-first' urban legend about Apple (like CD-ROM, DVD, gigabit, Firewire etc), please.
There are numerous online movie stores out there:
»www.movielink.com »www.vongo.com »www.cinemanow.com »www.atomfilms.com - this one offers FREE downloads including Atomfilms Hi-Def
And of course, there are lots of free movies already available on Google Video, Veoh or other existing video sites. |
|
  knightmb Everybody Lies
join:2003-12-01 Franklin, TN | reply to yabos Your sarcasm detector is broken, so LOL all around. |
|
  kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :said by cableties :$9.99?? Make it $2 and I'd think about it. Wait. No Thanks. I get Netflix and at the rate I watch films, it has to be "" $2 a movie. A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Between Netflix, Blockbuster, cable PPV, etc. offering these movies, anything higher than that from iTunes and the renters would be dummies for paying it. Exactly. Even $4 is ridiculously high compared to PPV which you can record. |
|
  kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY | reply to AnonProxy Steve... is it you?
FYI: $9.99 would be hilarious, a granted failure. You can buy movies on DVD from $9, let alone that Netflix starts at $6/mo.
They have to price it at $2 or less otherwise it won't fly. |
|
 yabos
join:2003-02-16 Ingersoll, ON | reply to knightmb You can already play the TV shows you can buy on your computer or your TV if you hook your computer up to your TV so LOL you don't know what you're talking about. |
|
 yabos
join:2003-02-16 Ingersoll, ON
| reply to cableties 9.99 to OWN is what he's talking about. Renting would obviously be cheaper cause who would pay 10 bucks to rent a downloaded movie. I'd say the success will be based on the quality of the movies. If they're the iPod resolution of 320x240 then I can't see a lot of people buying them. TV shows can get away with this quality because they're usually not "action" like a lot of movies are. You want a large screen for a movie but not necessarily a TV show. |
|
  knightmb Everybody Lies
join:2003-12-01 Franklin, TN | reply to AnonProxy Who wants to bet that you can *only* play them on the iPod? That way you have to watch the movie on the little screen, LOL. |
|
  xmrocks Premium,MVM join:2003-09-23 clubs:  
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Agreed about the price. However, I still think it'll be a big success down the road. At first, I'm thinking iTunes/Apple will get slammed with criticism about it but still be a pioneer in that respect of bring movies to your desktop for a price (at least I know of know Mac-compatible sites for movie rentals/downloads at the current time though I'm sure there are Windows-based sites).
And people will rent the movies -- that's the thing. I agree they'd be dummies for doing it, but I have a hunch it'll be successful. Call me crazy  -- I don't tolerate phishing - >>phishtracker |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to cableties said by cableties :$9.99?? Make it $2 and I'd think about it. Wait. No Thanks. I get Netflix and at the rate I watch films, it has to be "" $2 a movie. A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Between Netflix, Blockbuster, cable PPV, etc. offering these movies, anything higher than that from iTunes and the renters would be dummies for paying it. -- -- Join Red Room Forum BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com My Web Page |
|