republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Google-Fi Coverage Map » Why coverage gaps with base stations right there
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Just wait... »
« Cool!  
AuthorAll Replies


sapo
I eat meat
Premium
join:2002-09-16
Sacramento, CA

reply to truocchio
Re: Why coverage gaps with base stations right there

Id agree, this looks like a project of someone who had nothing better to do. Then again free outdoor Internet even at 1mbps is awesome, your average Silicon Valley person basically just needs enough to download MP3s.
--
La ilaha illah Allah

truocchio

join:2004-07-05
Miami Beach, FL


1 edit
reply to TKJunkMail
It is nearly impossible to avoid covering nearby areas, even with directional antennas you still have significant back plane that will provide coverage if close enough. That being said there is no way to accurately do a coverage map because it really all depends on the strength of your wireless card and the antenna gain on the card (or internal laptop antenna). So they should have said that this is the coverage with xx mw card and xx gain antenna. A high power radio with high gain antenna could pick this up from miles away.

These coverage gaps are probably areas they were told to stay away from or that are just not a location they want included in the "coverage zone". Other may be due to geographic or other obstacles (see below post of large house, lmao), whether physical or political.

I am probably going to flamed for this but the whole idea just really is a bit silly. 370 transmitters plus backhaul units to give outdoor internet access of 1 mbps. Most if not all people there will still need their own home connection, because its an outdoor network and 1 meg (best case) will not cut it for your average silicon valley resident. I can see some convenience factors for public areas, which can be done without doing the every persons front yard at a considerable price savings. Lastly anyone who truly needs mobile coverage probably has EVDO or some other 3g which are now clocking in at 3x1.8megs (see article above). Great concept but I miss the practicality of the whole thing and the ROI, not monetary, but usage wise. I guess we can wait 6 month and see how much this network actually gets utilized. My guess is low usage....
Forums » Google-Fi Coverage MapJust wait... »
« Cool!  


Sunday, 29-Nov 11:36:21 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [123] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [76] Weekend Open Thread
· [74] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Blue Ray: Samsung BD-P3600 or LG BD390 [Audio/Video Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Digital Transport Adapter Unboxing Photos [Comcast Cable TV]
· Anyone have a problem [Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]