rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04
USA
| reply to PDXPLT
Re: Here we go again
said by PDXPLT  :said by aggie2 : ...a single option that has had almost every trial stopped due to interference issues. To be fair, almost all those trials were based on technology from a single supplier, one with known interference issues. I think you're right that all of the shutdowns have involved one vendor, however there's two other vendors that have had several interference complaints, one that has been in the spotlight recently and another one that the FCC has been sitting on for a long time. |
|
PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR
| reply to Aggie Dan
said by aggie2 : ...a single option that has had almost every trial stopped due to interference issues. To be fair, almost all those trials were based on technology from a single supplier, one with known interference issues.
OTOH, the BPL deployment in Cinncinati hasn't had any complaints, and Motorola's BPL has been OK as well.
I'll agree that the economics vs. the competition look real tough; e.g., 'looks like a non-starter for rural deployments, dispite what the politicians say. |
|
Aggie Dan
Stop... Reverse That.
Premium
join:2001-01-30
Frisco, TX
clubs:
| reply to Transmaster
"holds great promise as a ubiquitous broadband solution that would offer a viable alternative to cable, digital subscriber line, fiber, and wireless broadband solutions" He missed satellite. So, unless I messed up my counting, we've got 5 non-interfering options for broadband deployment (all shooting for 30% market share at least in order to remain profitable) in one corner and a single option that has had almost every trial stopped due to interference issues.
What a knucklehead.
--
Note : The statements made by myself are my own and not the opinions of my employer or of my coworkers. 15.81 GHz Crunching Power | My Random Thoughts... Yes, I have thoughts. |
|
