said by SD6 
:sorry, but I don't like anonymous reviews that totally lambast a product. just too many possible people out there with axes to grind.
also, I've never seen the "plus it's covered by patents" remark in a technical review. a technical person is usually not qualified to say such a thing, and usually doesn't care anyway. the one patent they did point to is not a patent, just a pending application
if the bad review is truly warranted, the next one will reach the same conclusion.
I suppose if the engineer is a patent agent, they could speak to it. At any rate, did anyone look at the claims. Yes, 54 and 55 are broad. But the first independant claim (claim 30 I think) is really quite funny.
·
