Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » ProcessGuard
Uniqs:
1257
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
aboutblank spyware and stopzilla software? »
« Why don't more people talk about Trend PC-Cillin?  
page: 1 · 2
controler

join:2003-11-02

ProcessGuard

Hello

I am seeing something wierd with PG. I and one other user has verified this. I saw it on my XP Pro desktop, then today installed PG on my laptop and see it there also.
I can't get a reply from DCS and not many are even trying it out over at Wilders.
I was wondering sif some of the users here could give it a try?

All you do is follow these steps.

1. go to »www.kkln.com/

2. click on the tab On The Loon

3. Click on Melanie

4. When the page loads, right click on her picture.

5. Click save as to desktop.

6. Open the file with Windows picture and fax viewer.

7. If Pg doesn't peep at first, close the picture and try it again. Sometimes takes twice.

8. Open the picture and click the magnify button.

On mine and one other posters system, PG alerts saying explorer.exe is trying to install service/Driver

controler
Clone 171162

join:2005-08-03

Re: ProcessGuard

Chalk up one more verification. I've been getting this PG alert with literally dozens of jpgs, ever since upgrading to V3.4 final. Its probably a bug?
controler

join:2003-11-02

We need to get more users verify this or nothing will be done.

What I wonder about it how does PG tag these files? How does it know one from another? It isn't the size, I tried that. I even resized the dang things and still alerts.
I have a ton of JPG's myself and PG only alerts on a few.
Can get no answer what so ever from DCS. Wrote them pri and in their so called forum.
Love the program, Hate their support now.

con

Nogard is me
Premium
join:2004-01-08
Columbus, OH
I tried for about 5 minutes and I didn't get a pop up saying anything about explorer tring to install a driver.
controler

join:2003-11-02
Did you have exe protection enabled,Plus all 4 globals checked?

con
controler

join:2003-11-02
And you have BoClean installed?
controler

join:2003-11-02
Chickens

norwegian
Premium
join:2005-02-15
Outback

Re: ProcessGuard

I have had it uninstalled, but willing to try installing the free version, if needed. Chicken indeed

norwegian
Premium
join:2005-02-15
Outback
·WestNet Broadband

Got nothing, other than a picture, opening with various image tools. PG though when running paint(windows) asked permission for paint program, and svchost as well after, but otherwise no other warnings. All the time I ran PG, never saw the service/driver request.

Maybe I missed something ?
controler

join:2003-11-02
thanks norweigen

You have to be running the latest version, everything ticked and has to be either Melanie or Nate form the website. Running XP

norwegian
Premium
join:2005-02-15
Outback

Re: ProcessGuard

I didn't click Nate, but clicked on Melanies file a dozen or so times, and opened it with various imaging software, but nothing unusual. Reboot and Watcher didn't record any changes in file structure either.
controler

join:2003-11-02
nick r over at Wilders was able to figure out you need the print spooler running before PG will alert.
I dissable the spooler with task manager and I do not get an alert either.

norwegian
Premium
join:2005-02-15
Outback
·WestNet Broadband

Re: ProcessGuard

Ah it was just setting up the printer for a hard copy, and PG was alerting to it. Love the software, but if I stay with KIS, it will not be on my machines. It was my first layer of defense for ages.

Kaspersky are advancing too much
controler

join:2003-11-02
yes all you need is the spooler running in task manager.
It still does not answer why Pg alerts only on those files and not others on my drive. Has to be a way PG tags them.

controler

Nogard is me
Premium
join:2004-01-08
Columbus, OH
I don't have BoClean running, I do however have PG running on all cylinders. I didn't get the message at all. I have Print Spoiler running also.

Irondell

@pipex.com
I have noticed that if you 'clean' JPGs with this »www.snapfiles.com/get/jpgcleaner.html ProcessGuard doesn't give out the usual alert. Why is that I wonder??

SpannerITWks
Premium
join:2005-04-22

Irondell

In a word, MetaData ! Normally hidden extra data within the file, sometimes can be used for dodgy purposes.

Spanner
--
I Only Know What I Know, But I'm Learning all The Time - Stay Safe - Spanner intheWorks
/SpannerITWks
controler

join:2003-11-02
Spanner

I never got a reply from DCS on this and most likely never will. It only happens with spoolsv.exe running.

So you say it is the meta feature huh that they use to tag files?

SpannerITWks
Premium
join:2005-04-22

Re: ProcessGuard

controler

Hey well i'm NO expert you All know that, but when i saw Irondell's post about the 'clean' JPGs, a bell immediately started ringing. Yeah, the bells the bells lol.

Anyways as cleaning image files " can " remove ALL MetaData, i'm " presuming " there " may " be a connection there. Quite why spoolsv.exe needs to be running @ the same time i'm not 100% sure.

But as i was just writing the above, the bells started again lol. Didn't the WMF exploit fiasco have some connection with spoolsv.exe, or was it the TextCreateRange exploit, or maybe both ?

Possibly someone can verify this, or otherwise !

Spanner
--
I Only Know What I Know, But I'm Learning all The Time - Stay Safe - Spanner intheWorks
/SpannerITWks
controler

join:2003-11-02

Spanner

I hear that but have that hole sealed as far as MS knows.

It happens on any install I have. Doesn't matter which computer. When I see it on a fresh install on a new computer I wonder. Support will not even make a peep on this one.

If there is hidden meta stuff attached to those JPGs, The site don't know about it I am sure. I know Melanie personaly.

con

norwegian
Premium
join:2005-02-15
Outback
·WestNet Broadband

Even with the latest version of PG, still get no warnings. Maybe it has to do with the web addresses in the data of the picture, without sounding paranoid.

ht tp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/
ht tp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
ht tp://ns.adobe.com/iX/1.0/'>
ht tp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/'>
ht tp://www.iec.ch
ht tp://www.iec.ch

On a side note: PG didn't alert to opening Opera to post this(fresh install of PG, turned off learning mode).

What is going on down at DCS headquarters ?
controler

join:2003-11-02
Pg doesn't alert on the download, nly the opening of the picture. It doesn't matter if you download it with IE or Firefox.

norwegian
Premium
join:2005-02-15
Outback
·WestNet Broadband


I downloaded the image of both pictures, off Internet Explorer to the desktop as you requested, the addresses came from the desktop image when viewed with FileAlyser.

But as prior, had no warning of any sort, and double-checked that spooler service was set to "started", and automatic, but this test was with the latest version 3.4.1.0, but the first test was with the prior build.

Good luck finding the answer;
just one of those software glitches from installation maybe, corrupt read/write, interpretation of the code ?

Also does everyone only see it with the "Full" version, as I could only test with the free version ?

controler

join:2003-11-02

I installed the full version on three computers. One XP Pro, One XP home laptop and One Dell XP home. I never dissallowed services.exe. In the main GUI tab
I have exe protection enabled. on top and bottom I have all 4 ticked. Open task manager and make sure spoolsv.exe is running Open the picture with Windows picture and fax viewer. PG may not alert on the first opening but usualy does on the second for sure. Otherwise when you open it and PG doesn't alert, all you have to do is click the magnifying glass and then PG alerts.
This is using the last two builds of PG FULL.
I have two LIC after the TDS-3 event.
The Dell is a used one I bought that had a fried MOBO,
So it has new Mobo & Hard Drive with fresh clean install of XP Home, PG & BoCLean.
If you shut down spoolsv.exe, the alerts go away.
It's not a system issue but tow of the desktop do have GeForce video cards installed. One had the GeForce software installed that came with card, the Dell only has the Windows driver for the card installed.
I know PG is having some issues with GeForce video cards?

controler

aol

@aol.com
Can someone clarify whether this bug is a security risk or a bug which needs some manipulation to expose if this thread is anything to go by ?
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Securityaboutblank spyware and stopzilla software? »
« Why don't more people talk about Trend PC-Cillin?  
page: 1 · 2


Monday, 30-Nov 12:52:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [23] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [22] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [17] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [11] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· filling an in-ground pool [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Portable power for blackouts? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]