Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | reply to inteller
Re: nice
Well I been reading comments that USB 2.0 has 480mbps max transfer but in real world results you only see 48mbps max. So I would assume the same would apply to usb 1.0.
That's why I thought it should obviously sport a usb 2.0 port. |
|
inteller
Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08
Tulsa, OK
| clever hiding of numbers. if you only see a tenth of the bandwidth you'd still see 1.2mbps which is a LOT more than you'll be averaging with this card. People think they are going to see 3.1mbps but lets not kid ourselves. You'd have to be the only one on that tower in perfect conditions.
--
"WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" |
|
Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | Obviously but at the same time you won't want to have any bottle necks either. |
|
inteller
Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08
Tulsa, OK | i don't think your USB mouse and keyboard are going to cause any bottlenecks. Your flash memory reader wont either.
--
"WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" |
|
Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | You don't seem to understand what I am saying.
If you are in a location that you can get higher than 1.2mbps you obviously would never benefit from those speeds because of the bottleneck transfer through usb. |
|
cwy1980
Premium
join:2004-08-10
Monmouth Junction, NJ
clubs:
 ·Verizon FIOS
| After reading this thread I am not sure where you are getting your math at. The USB 1.1 supported max transfer (aka Full Speed USB) is 12Mbps.
The max transfer speed sprint thinks users will hit is only 3.1 Mbps...just over a quarter of the available bandwidth provided by a Full Speed USB device. There should be NO problem at all for USB 1.1 compliant devices to be able to handle EVDO-A implementations.
However, I think it will probably come as a USB 2.0 device just because that future-proofs it a little better.
--
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy |
|
