nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
 ·Comcast
| cache at risk of being sued?
unless an ISP has an agreement that the (legal) content can be cached (sounds like a copy to me), I would imagine they would be at risk of being sued by the content owner/industry.
I would also imagine that before that agreement is made, the owner/industry would demand payment for caching that copy. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
| said by nasadude  :unless an ISP has an agreement that the (legal) content can be cached (sounds like a copy to me), I would imagine they would be at risk of being sued by the content owner/industry. I would also imagine that before that agreement is made, the owner/industry would demand payment for caching that copy. No, BT caching wouldnt get takedown'ed, »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Cop···ovisions
BT caching is automatic, and based on load or w/e, then the ISP isnt liable, its the users that trigger the caching, and if a ISP doesnt cache, the users will still receive it.
P2P throttling will never work until the internet becomes a walled garden and thats not any time soon. Caching is the only thing ISP can do to not pay for high transit costs. |
|
bohn
join:2006-05-30
Scarborough, ON
| reply to nasadude
The problem is these leeches. Now traffic shaping or no traffic shaping these maggots that don't share should be tossed off of bittorent forever not just by changing ip addresses. The solution is to blackball these leeches for life so they never get back on the bittorent network ever well as their decendents with the same last name. |
|
