Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Lafayette Hits Another Roadblock » that's the way telecom bizness is done in the US
Uniqs:
44
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
guess the vote last year was worthless »
« City should do it anyway  
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

that's the way telecom bizness is done in the US

This is our telecom industry at work in the U.S. - instead of building out/updating their systems, telecom companies sue cities, counties and states to prevent them from providing services (which will usually be cheaper and better).

I wonder how much fiber could be deployed with the money the telcos spend on lobbying and lawsuits?

Coxlad

@bls.com

Re: that's the way telecom bizness is done in the US

Why should the government regulate Telecommunications and yet enter the market themselves? Conflict of Interest.
Don't believe what the media wants you to hear. There's more to the story.

jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:

Re: that's the way telecom bizness is done in the US

said by Coxlad :

Why should the government regulate Telecommunications and yet enter the market themselves? Conflict of Interest.
Why should Telecommunications Companies run the market and write (excuse me) "suggest" telecom law? (which is happening with many of these telecom bills on the state and federal level).

THAT'S a conflict of interest.

mr sean
Professional Infidel
Premium,ExMod 2001-07
join:2001-04-03
N. Absentia
clubs:

said by Coxlad :

Why should the government regulate Telecommunications and yet enter the market themselves?
Why should Telecommunications keep going to the government asking them to regulate everyone else?
--
How you can make the world a Better Place
Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
·Verizon FIOS

said by Coxlad :

Why should the government regulate Telecommunications and yet enter the market themselves? Conflict of Interest.
Don't believe what the media wants you to hear. There's more to the story.
Heh, the media is what we're talking about here; or the control of it. It's a different government that regulates internet service providers.(Local governments don't regulate telecommunications) Personally I don't think municipals should provide service, just infrastructure, that way they don't need to go through the mess of revenue bonds. Plus an even playing field of service providers (one in which a competitor doesn't own the infrastructure) will provide a more ideal service to constituents.
Forums » Lafayette Hits Another Roadblockguess the vote last year was worthless »
« City should do it anyway  


Saturday, 28-Nov 10:44:16 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [72] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [69] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [54] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Once infected, Impossible to detect [Security]
· 5 hour energy for diabetic [General Questions]
· Hosts file attributes set to system and hidden [Security]
· Motion Sickness Solutions? [General Questions]
· Speedtest server [TekSavvy]
· Using computer as internet server and antivirus [Security]
· Backstab vs screws (not which to use) [Home Repair & Improvement]