Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » Signal strength-AP vs. CPE
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
My own mini-ISP »
« Monowall general Traffic Shaper queue approaches ?  
lutful
Premium
join:2005-06-16
Ottawa, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..

Re: Signal strength-AP vs. CPE

Never thought that Fresnel impact could be different on AP-CPE versus CPE-AP.

Otherwise, any difference in RSSI should only be due to TX power and RX sensitivity, not EIRP, since AP/CPE cables and antenna gains are the same.

In his case, the AP radio seems to have lesser specs than the CPE radio?
LLigetfa

join:2006-05-15
Fort Frances, ON

Re: Signal strength-AP vs. CPE

said by lutful See Profile :

Never thought that Fresnel impact could be different on AP-CPE versus CPE-AP.
I do not want to bring into question your expertise in radio propagation as my own expertise will not go unscrutinized. I have no formal education in the theories of radio propagation, only life experiences.

Wikipedia, in describing the fresnel zone, states:
To maximise receiver strength you need to minimise the effect of the out of phase signals. To do that you must make sure the strongest signals don't bump into anything - they have the maximum chance of getting to the receiver location.
In my mind then it stands to reason that obstructions near the transmitter where the signal is strongest, would have a larger impact. If you were to experiment with a light source and a fresnel lense or anything that effects the light beam, you would see the effect of the lens or obstruction in relation to the distance from the source.

said by lutful See Profile :

Otherwise, any difference in RSSI should only be due to TX power and RX sensitivity, not EIRP, since AP/CPE cables and antenna gains are the same.
You seem to have lost me on that logic. How can you assume AP/CPE cables and antenna gains are the same? I would not make that assumption.

The only point I was trying to make is that conditions are not symmetrical and so each direction needs to be considered separately. As you point out, RX sensitivity also needs to be factored and TX power adjusted to suit.
LLigetfa

join:2006-05-15
Fort Frances, ON

Re: Signal strength-AP vs. CPE

Anyway... back on topic.
Aaron,
Antennas have different characteristics and the terrain can also throw you a curve. One should never assume, as you found out, the RSSI on the other side. You would not be the first nor will you be the last to waste time aligning an antenna on one of the side lobes.
lutful
Premium
join:2005-06-16
Ottawa, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..


1 edit
This is what I meant in my last post: the thought somehow never crossed my mind that Fresnel effect could be different for AP-CPE versus CPE-AP

Here is a simple RSSI/SNR formula using absolute magnitudes of the negative loss dB numbers:

For half-duplex or TDD WISP radios we use, these numbers do not change depending on which way we are transmitting:

CONSTANT = AP_ANT_GAIN - AP_CABLE_LOSS + CPE_ANT_GAIN - CPE_CABLE_LOSS

RSSI/SNR1 for AP->CPE: AP_TX + CPE_RX + CONSTANT - PATH_LOSS1
RSSI/SNR2 for CPE->AP: CPE_TX + AP_RX + CONSTANT - PATH_LOSS2

PATH_LOSS1 = PATH_LOSS2 if fading was similar (measurement taken at almost the same time) and if Fresnel effect was same both ways.

So, observed difference is mainly due to radio TX/RX characteristics: (CPE_TX - AP_TX) + (AP_RX - CPE_RX)

Since TX spec difference between radios are a few dB, the dominant effect on RSSI/SNR seems to come from differences in RX sensitivity.
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service ProvidersMy own mini-ISP »
« Monowall general Traffic Shaper queue approaches ?  


Saturday, 28-Nov 21:16:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [69] Weekend Open Thread
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Why would I want an e reader? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· AV-Comp. Retrospective/Proactive Test 11/2009 released [Security]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]