Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast on Net Neutrality: Apocalyptic Gobbledygook » Two mouth holes. Guess where the other one is..
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Wait a second...thats not what ol' Bri said. »
« Something that does not exsist get so much attention.  
AuthorAll Replies


batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to Ahrenl
Re: Two mouth holes. Guess where the other one is..

said by Ahrenl See Profile :

Fortunately the entire discussion is framed around the internet service pipe. (or tube if you like ) If Verizon and AT&T would like to setup a separate service just for hospitals, and separate service for games, then more power to them.

How would they do that, run a separate tube? The trouble is special interest want a law for a problem that does not exist. How will the law work? Will the entire bandwidth of FIOS be neutral? Will Microsoft say Verizon can not set aside bandwidth for TV, VOIP or a virtual private network?

Before you say I am being ridiculous tell me how the law will be written, written by people that think the internet is tubes.

I would not oppose a neutral net for the common man. If a company has revenue above a billion a year let them pay.

backness

join:2005-07-08
K2P OW2

doesn't that limit access to companies with a billion dollars to good speeds on the net? What about small and medium sized businesses (which are the heart and soul of America and out number large corps by a large margin) your solution leaves them having to pay extortion to the already rich for their services


batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by backness See Profile :

doesn't that limit access to companies with a billion dollars to good speeds on the net? What about small and medium sized businesses (which are the heart and soul of America and out number large corps by a large margin) your solution leaves them having to pay extortion to the already rich for their services
You have what I said backwards. You can post your dancing hamsters and have net-neutrality. Once you make a billion dollars a year posting your dancing hamsters you have to pay the pipe provider.
Forums » Comcast on Net Neutrality: Apocalyptic GobbledygookWait a second...thats not what ol' Bri said. »
« Something that does not exsist get so much attention.  


Monday, 23-Nov 14:58:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [48] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [21] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [19] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [9] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [6] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [4] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Bell's Network Management practices page [TekSavvy]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Extra charge to use Master Card instead of Visa? [General Questions]
· Rate my website [General Questions]
· low moonkin dmg [World of Warcraft]
· openSUSE 11.2 problems and solutions? [All Things Unix]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· linux box alternative to NetEqualizer ? ? Does it exist? [Wireless Service Providers]