Re: i don't think it's completely unreasonable

Tikker_LoS join:2004-04-29 Regina, SK ·SaskTel Saskatchewan	reply to grandpinaple Re: i don't think it's completely unreasonable said by grandpinaple : I am a bit concerned about latency and reliability. Care to elaborate? latency isn't too bad actually (in the tests I've done) it's not dsl/cable but it's no where near satellite pings it's a lot like being on interleave profile in dsl (15-30 ms pings)
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-08-23 16:01:15 ·
Michieru2 zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL 1 edit	reply to grandpinaple Reliability will most likely be greater since you are not physically attached with wires. All you need is your responder and a power supply to connect. If power goes out you can always back that up with a generator with voltage regulator or with a UPS backup and your connection would be up and running just fine. Unlike if a pole snaps across the street and now your block is without phone service. Even if the CO on the other end is running just fine your link is broken. So that's advantageous over any wired network. Latency depends on the technology used there is canopy, EV-DO Rev A, RF, and more from what I heard. I can't give you more information than what I know since I am currently looking into that data myself. But there is a WISP forum here, if anything we would find our answer there from people who actually own the equipment. I at least know Canopy operates somewhere in the 5.8Ghz range. EDIT: I know this is not a reliable source but here >> »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopy_%28wireless%29
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-08-22 23:00:19 ·
grandpinaple join:2006-01-03 New York, NY	reply to Michieru2 I am a bit concerned about latency and reliability. Care to elaborate?
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-08-22 22:38:29 ·


Friday, 04-Dec 10:30:56	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF