Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Google, Brazil, and Privacy » Google put itself in this predicament
Uniqs:
24
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Legal jurisdiction applies where the government says it does  

R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo

join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA
·Comcast

Google put itself in this predicament

Had they complied from the start, they would have come out ahead. The Brazilian court wasn't asking for wholesale data, it was asking for specific accounts with strong evidence of pedophilia and other criminal offenses. What google was doing was aiding criminals by keeping their information from the courts.

I have an orkut account to keep in touch with my Brazilian friends and the stuff you see in some accounts is outrageous and downright criminal. There was this one community blatantly selling illegal drugs from their forum.

Google's stance was unsustainable. It was basically saying "We don't care what they do, we're not telling you who they are".
BarneyBadAss
Badasses Fight For Freedom
Premium
join:2004-05-07
00001
·Verizon FIOS

Re: Google put itself in this predicament

Your correct, Google put itself into this position.

And the reason they got there was becasue they were capturing data about search requests and storing it.

If they had never done that in the first place, now these g'ments woudn't be asking for the data.

Personally; I think they shouldn't capture the data at all.
--
---Barney

2kmaro
Think
Premium,ExMod 1 BC
join:2000-07-11
ColossalCave
clubs:

It does seem shameful that a refusal to give up personal information had to be made for such an obnoxious cause. But I think here in the States we've become accustomed to seeing strong defense of the accused's rights. To a degree this goes in that direction. I don't think Google was trying to protect the guilty so much as
#1 - protecting their information base,
#2 - protecting their income
#3 - protecting all from unreasonable search and siezure in the future.

No company should be forced to turn over such information if proper procedures haven't been followed. I wouldn't think badly of a company if they voluntarily handed over that kind of informationi for a situation like this, but even that sets a bad precendent the next time the company has to go to court to try to prevent such disclosure just because some one (RIAA comes to mind) or government comes at them and says "you have to because I said to".
Forums » Google, Brazil, and Privacy« Legal jurisdiction applies where the government says it does  


Friday, 27-Nov 03:00:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [114] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [63] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [56] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [35] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]