Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Will Slingbox 'Bring Down the Network?' » Slingbox issues have a solution: pay per bit
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
You know what? »
« Cell phone companies offer "High Speed" internet for surfing  
FightingBlue

join:2006-04-08
Warsaw, NY

Re: Slingbox issues have a solution: pay per bit

Kamm is correct here: the reality is that if networks can't keep up with people using them, the network has to be fixed. Period. And charging more isn't the answer--in fact, it's possibly the stupidest idea in the whole mess. There's no shortage of bandwidth. If you look at all the dark fiber and other unused trunk space, you'd realize that service providers, particularly backbone providers are trying to sell bottled water for $20 a gallon. Then they have the temerity to complain when someone actually uses the service as promised, because that shaves a little off their profit margins, and reduces how much they can oversell their service without upgrading it.

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Slingbox issues have a solution: pay per bit

I'm amused that the argument here focused so quickly on cable ISPs and their overbuilding needs--the article focused on Verizon Wireless, not cable.

I'm also in that school of thought that ISPs may have to charge by the bit to cover the cost of shared facilities (i.e., connections at peering points and the backhaul from those points to the local hub). I also agree that not immediately building facilities to let every user have 100% bandwidth to the peering points 24/7 makes good economic sense.

In the next breath, however, it's necessary to say that the ISPs' obligations include building enough shared facilities to handle demand and to disclose any limits they may place on their services up front. Having "invisible" caps is ridiculous and likely a deceptive trade practice.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

kammer

@comcast.net

Re: Slingbox issues have a solution: pay per bit

That's because people like kamm are BBR's telco lobby. In case you haven't noticed, pretty much anything he says is somehow related to how evil cable companies are.

If he were really unbiased, he'd simply say the truth: both the telco and cable industries are greedy and stupid.
Forums » Will Slingbox 'Bring Down the Network?'You know what? »
« Cell phone companies offer "High Speed" internet for surfing  


Tuesday, 08-Dec 19:01:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [191] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [71] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [53] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [49] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [41] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [18] Verizon Settles With NJ Over Misleading FiOS Marketing
Most people now reading
· Servers UP!!! [World of Warcraft]
· Top 10 things to do while servers are down! [World of Warcraft]
· SERVERS DoWN!!! [World of Warcraft]
· Google chief: Only miscreants worry about net privacy [Security]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3.0 (12-08-2009) [World of Warcraft]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3 (12-8-2009) [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.3 Out today [World of Warcraft]