 pb5k more cowbell Premium join:2005-11-16 Glendale, AZ
·Cox HSI
| Re: Yes I don't mind that they would cite "airport security" as the reason, so long as they can disclose specfically how their paid wifi access is "safe" while continental's free wifi is dangerous to "airport security". 
Put up or shut up, I say. -- "When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.'" -- Theodore Roosevelt | |
|
  tsu9
join:2001-08-17 Wheeling, IL | Re: Yes It's a well-known fact that terrorists have lots of frequent-flier miles.  | |
|
 |  |
 |  |
 |
 |   Camelot One Premium,MVM join:2001-11-21 Sarasota, FL clubs: | Re: Yes Actually some groups have already fought wifi deployments based on the claim it endangers children by causing cancer. The deployments were in schools. | |
|
 |  |  |
  insomniac84
join:2002-01-03 Schererville, IN | I think its a joke that the airport wants to control the airline's security. The airline in my opinion should have full control off all security over the airport. The planes are the targets, not the food courts. | |
|
 iotastorm
join:2006-01-24 Florissant, MO | Well you you must realize that SANCTIONED Hot-spots must be capable of not interfering with other radio sources, instead of those UNSANCTIONED Hot Spots you know how much NOISIER they can be....(snicker, chortle, BWHAHAHAHA) | |
|
 |
|
 |