republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Fios Spending: $9,650 for Each Home? » A little less
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
What about existing DSL users? »
« higher densities..  
AuthorAll Replies


Phil Harvey

@69.15.x.x

reply to wwdubbia
Re: A little less

re: "They are just playing with numbers to make it all sound horrible... "

Not really. I don't think spending $9K+ a home for a network connection that will be cutting edge for decades is a bad idea.

I'm playing with numbers to point out that installing fiber is not cheap. If it were, AT&T, Qwest, and the old BellSouth would have already done it to 100 percent of their homes.

Verizon's definitely breaking new ground with FiOS, but the cost of doing nothing is far, far greater.

ph


wwdubbia

join:2002-06-03
Clinton, NY

reply to wentlanc
said by wentlanc See Profile :

I hate the way these guys do math. It costs them $950 per home to pass, and $650 to connect "later on sometime" according to the article. So, every home costs $1600 to connect. It does not cost more per home to connect FEWER subscribers. It does cost to pass. Their math artificially inflates the cost per home based on the take rate to liquidate the overall cost for a single neighborhood. Assume 400 homes in a neighborhood. That is a $640K cost to connect all homes. Assume that they got 80% saturation for telephone service only, 400 homes, times the $1600 each to connect, $640,000 paid for over 30 years would be about $5.50 a month per subscriber assuming 320 subs. How realistic is it that they could get 80% of the telephone market? Now add in television and HSI and you tell me that it is too expensive. They are just playing with numbers to make it all sound horrible, when in fact they will still make money hand over fist.

Assume a their theoretical 10% take rate. (again, that is the immediate take rate, no long term predictions there)

$380K to offer service to a neighborhood of 400 subs.
+
$26K to connect their immediate 10% take rate.
=
$406,000
240 payments over 30 years per sub
9600 payments of $42 a month to pay that back.

Assume that they force conversion of telephone subs to fiber. Assume that they only have 50% of telephone subs in this neighborhood (low IMHO).

$130K to connect those 200 subs
=
$510,000
48000 payments of $10.62 a month to pay back over 30 years.
Much better return rate. If they can get a single service from the majority of their users, they will pay off the network in no time.

Assume 90% of the neighborhood uses them for phone..

$234K to connect those 360 subs.
=
$614,000
129,600 payments of $4.73 a month to pay back over 30 years.

Sound expensive now? Sure there will be fluctuations depending on take rate, and many other things, but they will not lose money, and it does not cost them what they are advertising, to connect you. It is BS marketing to gain sympathy. Will they come back and lower your prices later on when it is less expensive becuase more people signed up? Doubt it.

puritan
The funny thing is that in 30 years Fios will be the equivalent of today's copper, so they can do ANOTHER deployment then of the latest and greatest technology and someone can dig up this thread and compare the numbers...

wentlanc
You Can't Fix Dumb..

join:2003-07-30
Maineville, OH

reply to NumberCruncher
I hate the way these guys do math. It costs them $950 per home to pass, and $650 to connect "later on sometime" according to the article. So, every home costs $1600 to connect. It does not cost more per home to connect FEWER subscribers. It does cost to pass. Their math artificially inflates the cost per home based on the take rate to liquidate the overall cost for a single neighborhood. Assume 400 homes in a neighborhood. That is a $640K cost to connect all homes. Assume that they got 80% saturation for telephone service only, 400 homes, times the $1600 each to connect, $640,000 paid for over 30 years would be about $5.50 a month per subscriber assuming 320 subs. How realistic is it that they could get 80% of the telephone market? Now add in television and HSI and you tell me that it is too expensive. They are just playing with numbers to make it all sound horrible, when in fact they will still make money hand over fist.

Assume a their theoretical 10% take rate. (again, that is the immediate take rate, no long term predictions there)

$380K to offer service to a neighborhood of 400 subs.
+
$26K to connect their immediate 10% take rate.
=
$406,000
240 payments over 30 years per sub
9600 payments of $42 a month to pay that back.

Assume that they force conversion of telephone subs to fiber. Assume that they only have 50% of telephone subs in this neighborhood (low IMHO).

$130K to connect those 200 subs
=
$510,000
48000 payments of $10.62 a month to pay back over 30 years.
Much better return rate. If they can get a single service from the majority of their users, they will pay off the network in no time.

Assume 90% of the neighborhood uses them for phone..

$234K to connect those 360 subs.
=
$614,000
129,600 payments of $4.73 a month to pay back over 30 years.

Sound expensive now? Sure there will be fluctuations depending on take rate, and many other things, but they will not lose money, and it does not cost them what they are advertising, to connect you. It is BS marketing to gain sympathy. Will they come back and lower your prices later on when it is less expensive becuase more people signed up? Doubt it.

puritan
Forums » Fios Spending: $9,650 for Each Home?What about existing DSL users? »
« higher densities..  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 20:17:15 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [161] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [93] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [38] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [WIN7] When exactly should you flash bios when installing new OS [Microsoft Help]
· 16% packet loss. damn dsl. los angeles [AT&T West]
· Network issues tonight [AT&T U-verse]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]