Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Local CA Video Franchises: 'Terminated' » More info on this bill not in newspapers
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
So how does this work? »
« Arnold Schwarzenegger for US President  
AuthorAll Replies


marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: More info on this bill not in newspapers

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

So, in effect, the localities still get to control service levels and safety. They get 5% franchise fee plus a 1% peg fee.
It doesn't say that.
It says the state will get a 5% franchise fee and the city, county, and state will each receive a piece of that.
Also notice that while the PEG fee is a facitilies fee only. Facilities fees are difficult to authorize in comparison to equipment fees and operational fees (and can only be used for education and government, not public access), which are the more important fees in PEG support. These parts are typically supported by pass through fees rather than gross revenue percentage fees, and pass through fees are banned by the bill. Any locality without existing percentage fees (i.e. that uses pass-through fees), can not collect such fees.

The definition of "gross revenue" is modified by the bill. "Gross revenue" is defined as the lowest gross revenue earned by any provider in the franchise area, not by the franchise holder.

Notice also that there are no density based buildout requirements in the bill. Instead, providers are required to buildout to 40% of households within 5 years with no requirement to buildout to more than 40% of households (and with an option to extend the deadline if less than 30% of builtout households have subscribed).

The last most important aspect is that despite the assurance that "So, in effect, the localities still get to control service levels and safety," only the state courts have exclusive jurisdiction to enforce provisions on fees, PEG channels, and I-nets and only the PUC and state courts can enforce buildout standards.

And of course the most important part of the bill: it prohibits local emergency service notification requirements.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu
Professional Geographer
Geographic Information Science researcher


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by marigolds See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

So, in effect, the localities still get to control service levels and safety. They get 5% franchise fee plus a 1% peg fee.
It doesn't say that.
It says the state will get a 5% franchise fee and the city, county, and state will each receive a piece of that.
And exactly where does it say that ?, because that is NOT in the analysis of the bill at this link:
»www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/···oor.html
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page


ropeguru
Premium
join:2001-01-25
Bridgeport, WV
clubs:
·VOIPo

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by marigolds See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

So, in effect, the localities still get to control service levels and safety. They get 5% franchise fee plus a 1% peg fee.
It doesn't say that.
It says the state will get a 5% franchise fee and the city, county, and state will each receive a piece of that.
And exactly where does it say that ?, because that is NOT in the analysis of the bill at this link:
»www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/···oor.html
It does say that the state will get 5%, but nothing about the localities getting a piece of that.
--
FWD#: 223611


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Requires the holder of a state franchise to pay rent to each
local entity
where it provides video service a franchise fee
based on the gross revenue, as defined in the statute, for the
use of the public right-of-way. If there is an incumbent cable
operator in that jurisdiction the fee shall be 5% of the holder's
gross revenue or the percentage applied to the incumbent's gross
revenue, whichever is less.
If there is no local franchises or
after all local franchise have expired, the franchise fee will be
5% of gross revenue or a lower level set by the local government
thru ordinance.
I'd like to see where you believe you are right. All I saw was you claiming it. No section of law cited.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page
Forums » Local CA Video Franchises: 'Terminated'So how does this work? »
« Arnold Schwarzenegger for US President  


Sunday, 29-Nov 18:34:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [78] Weekend Open Thread
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]