dslextreme
Premium,VIP
join:2001-02-23
Canoga Park, CA | What's the point of appointing a former telco lobbyist?
If they can't vote on part of the FCC's agenda. |
|
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD | Not sure how he will be for consumers, but he was a lobbyist for CLECs, which at least says he has been against the ILECs some (most?) of the time. |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | These think tank and telecom lawyers think and fight for what they're paid to think and fight for. I think his personal political beliefs mirror our resident deregulatory zealots....and Martin's. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to dslextreme
said by dslextreme  :If they can't vote on part of the FCC's agenda. Recusals won't last long. In a year he will be voting on all FCC issues. |
|
dslextreme
Premium,VIP
join:2001-02-23
Canoga Park, CA
2 edits | That in itself is a red flag. Not that many of the FCCs policies do not raise a red flag today. |
|
hoyleysox
join:2003-11-07
Long Beach, CA | reply to Karl Bode
Can't accuse Karl the news guy of pretending to be objective and unbiased. |
|
rachelsfx
join:2004-09-27
Pensacola, FL | reply to dslextreme
The report says the Justice Department hasn't ruled on the merger as yet. So, why was the FCC voting in the first place with clearence from the DOJ? |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | reply to hoyleysox
Yes, it's a big secret I'm pro-consumer and a humanist who writes for a pro-consumer website that focuses on the user perspective. The bias police win another victory!
Which part of what I said isn't accurate? |
|
Maxo
Your tax dollars at work.
Premium,VIP
join:2002-11-04
Tallahassee, FL
clubs:
| reply to hoyleysox
said by hoyleysox :Can't accuse Karl the news guy of pretending to be objective and unbiased. He's never pretended to be. The people who run this site have their point of view and do not apologise for it. As long as they are open about it then no problem. |
|
