Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Place your bets - Closed vs Stealthed
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
IE7.0 Released! »
« wssc.exe  
AuthorAll Replies


jbob
Reach Out and Touch Someone
Premium
join:2004-04-26
Little Rock, AR
·Comcast
·AT&T Southwest

reply to MxxCon
Re: Place your bets - Closed vs Stealthed

said by MxxCon See Profile :

said by rotty97 See Profile :

Apprarently the response a hacker gets from a "Stealthed" port is different then a response you get from an IP that doesn't exist.
if all of your ports are FILTERED(i hate 'stealthed' term), it will appear exactly the same as non-existing ip, so 'a hacker' will not get a different response because he will not get a response at all.
Not true. A response from a non-existant IP should be "Destination unreacheable" whereas there is NO response from a "Filtered" IP port. Or something like that! If one is paying attention that of course means something is there, it's just not answering. In that sense "Filtered" makes more sense than "Stealthed!"


MxxCon

join:1999-11-19
Brooklyn, NY
clubs:

said by jbob See Profile :

Not true. A response from a non-existant IP should be "Destination unreacheable" whereas there is NO response from a "Filtered" IP port.
that is incorrect because "Destination Unreachable" is an ICMP error message, where as port scans are either TCP or UDP.
--
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]


gkweb

join:2003-06-09
76800


1 edit
That you send TCP/UDP or ICMP packets makes no difference, if you don't exist, the last router should send back an "host unreachable" ICMP message.

That's why indeed "FILTERED" is probably more right than "stealth", because that's what you do, filtering (drop).
The absence of any message clearly shows you are there, dropping packets. "Stealth" is misleading in the way it could mean invisible.

The advantages of stealth are not to make you invisible, but rather to allow you to mitigate reflective attacks and in few cases to save upstream bandwidth. Also, security scanners such as nmap need at least one open port and one closed port to guess your OS. If you are running a server (some IM software or P2P are acting like servers) and you are not sending back responses from closed ports, it may help to prevent giving away too much information about your OS.

Regards,
gkweb.
--
Firewall tester : »www.firewallleaktester.com

*member of ASAP : Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals*
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityIE7.0 Released! »
« wssc.exe  


Thursday, 26-Nov 10:46:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [107] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [104] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [68] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [49] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [32] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [31] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· pfSense vs IPCop vs Zeroshell vs Monowall vs Tomato [TekSavvy]