dispatcher21
join:2004-01-22
united state
| reply to Combat Chuck
Re: YES!!
An income stream for government is not a tax. Tax is something that everyone pays and gets equal access to(police, fire, EMS, nice roads, water treatment and the such). An income stream is payed for by people that use the service, if you dont use it, you dont have to pay for it. |
|
NPGMBR
join:2001-03-28
Arlington, VA | reply to karlmarx
The jokes on you dude. You should have read his/her post a little more carefully before you tried to cut him/her down. |
|
travelguy
join:1999-09-03
Santa Fe, NM
| reply to jtel
said by jtel  :violate lease agreements Yep. So the next time the lease expires there will be this funky little clause in the new lease that states that the rent will be 3X if the tenant wishes to use their own wireless ISP.
Celebrate now - the victory won't last long. |
|
Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA
| reply to karlmarx
said by karlmarx :As usual, you attempt to obfuscate the issue by declaring it a 'tax issue', when in reality it's nothing of the sort. As usual you try to obfuscate the issue by playing the semantics card. It may not be a tax in name, but it is an income stream for the government that the politicians don't have to worry about paying a price for. Why raise taxes to cover the port authority (risking a citizen backlash and being voted out)when you can jack up the price of a service for a captive audience and force out competitors at what is essentially gunpoint.
--
Early to rise, early to bed;
Makes a man healthy but socially dead. |
|
karlmarx
join:2006-09-18
iraq
 ·Fairpoint Communic..
| reply to TKJunkMail
"Taxes on people who don't actually vote in a state is a favorite with politicians."
Umm, what 'taxes' are you talking about. This is a ruling that states the unlicensed spectrum is just that, unlicensed. The ruling has NOTHING to do with taxes, or fees, or 'homeland security'. The ruling just codifies the right of any user to use any 'unlicensed' spectrum, wherever they may be.
As usual, you attempt to obfuscate the issue by declaring it a 'tax issue', when in reality it's nothing of the sort.
--
Stick it to the MAN. Support your local torrent sites. Proudly providing 10mb of upstream for all your TV, Movie, and MP3 needs. |
|
jtel
join:2005-06-28
Bristol, RI
| reply to livininarizona
Not sure here but I doubt Massport is done with this and I doubt the FCC is the last legal resort in regards to 'lease agreements'.
From the Boston Globe:
"Massport argued that Continental's free service would interfere with its network, raise safety concerns and violate lease agreements." |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to livininarizona
said by livininarizona :This is what we need! Puts some competition back in the airport and prevents the government organization regulating the airport(Massport) from holding up travelers with another onerous tax on many of the out of state residents who use the airport. Taxes on people who don't actually vote in a state is a favorite with politicians.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
livininarizona
Premium
join:2001-08-05
Merced, CA
clubs:   | This is what we need! |
|
