Re: So find them and swat them again

Cyron join:2002-09-24 Charlotte, NC	reply to TKJunkMail Re: So find them and swat them again said by TKJunkMail : HR>But you are denying the copyright holder income. You may not care, but I'm sure the copyright holder does. A person is only denying the copyright holder income, if they would have purchased the work had a free copy not been available. Since this can't be proved either way, you cannot claim definitivey that there is lost income.
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-11-02 19:46:37 ·
TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ ·Sprint Mobile Broa.. ·Comcast	reply to Ahrenl Said by: Ahrenl You're discussing copyright law, which, by the way, isn't in the bible. So you should have no problem with copyright infringement. quote: Neither are airplanes or cars. Is it alright to steal them? Many developing countries have a problem with copyright laws specifically because they will never get a chance to own the vast number of patents that new patents will be based on. quote: Patents and copyrights are 2 entirely different things. I still believe that if you are not harming the livelihood of the copyright holder (as the law actually states) you shouldn't be liable for civil damages. quote: But you are denying the copyright holder income. You may not care, but I'm sure the copyright holder does. -- -- My BLOG My Web Page
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-11-02 18:32:25 ·


Friday, 27-Nov 20:35:59	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. republican-creole page compression OFF