Jedi Writer
Premium
join:2006-04-01
USA
| reply to AB
Re: How to rollback FireFox
Thanks AB.
However, when I look for "Firefox 1.5.0.7 installer" I am taken to a Mozilla/Firefox website that clearly identifies itself as version 1.5.0.7. It has lots of info about that version. But when I click on download it doesn't download 1.5.0.7 but jumps me to Mozilla's FireFox 2.0 download site and link.
It's just too complicated for me. I am strictly a go to add/remove programs and click on remove things like IE 7. Bingo it is gone. And in its place is IE 6 and with all the settings and bookmarks I had on IE 6.
I think I will just at the serious level leave it alone and play with it overtime. I can live with the issues in 2.0--flashplayer not working properly with the main page videos. If I really want to see the videos I can use IE 7.
All this talks of profiles documents and settings/me/application/data/mozilla/firefox/profiles and so on is currently just too much for me! LOL!
Heck I am the only person who uses on this machine. Why do they have to make it so complicated or more accurately involving so many steps and directions and a certain prior knowledge and competency level with software and commands, profiles etc? What profile. It is just me. 
But hey man thanks for the friendly info. |
|
photobum
join:2005-11-04
Fairborn, OH
1 edit | Oracle, I'm guessing here, you never said what OS...so
»releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla···2/en-US/ |
|
thewolfman
join:2003-04-03
Niagara Falls, NY
clubs:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to Jedi Writer
So there is too much information for you?? I do not know everything, I was only trying to understand what you wanted. If Firefox is just too difficult for you, maybe IE7 is more up your alley. I would gladly do it for you, all you have to do is ask for help.
This is a public forum and people are only trying to help. Maybe you shouldn't be so defense?
--
Live and learn........ |
|
Sandman5
Premium
join:2002-07-10
Brookline, MO
clubs:
| said by thewolfman  :So there is too much information for you?? I do not know everything, I was only trying to understand what you wanted. If Firefox is just too difficult for you, maybe IE7 is more up your alley. I would gladly do it for you, all you have to do is ask for help. This is a public forum and people are only trying to help. Maybe you shouldn't be so defense? Lighten up; the OP did not get defensive until you gave him/her a reason to do so.
--
Rule #62: Don't take yourself so damn seriously! |
|
AB
Premium
join:2006-04-04
Leesburg, VA
| reply to Jedi Writer
said by Jedi Writer :. . Why do they have to make it so complicated or more accurately involving so many steps and directions and a certain prior knowledge and competency level with software and commands, profiles etc? What profile. It is just me. It's no more difficult or complicated than anything else you do on the computer. But suit yourself.
If you're interested, here is where you can download any version of Firefox that pleases you:
»www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=firefox |
|
thewolfman
join:2003-04-03
Niagara Falls, NY
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Verizon Online DSL
| said by AB :said by Jedi Writer :. . Why do they have to make it so complicated or more accurately involving so many steps and directions and a certain prior knowledge and competency level with software and commands, profiles etc? What profile. It is just me. It's no more difficult or complicated than anything else you do on the computer. But suit yourself. If you're interested, here is where you can download any version of Firefox that pleases you: » www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=firefox There you go.........
--
Live and learn........ |
|
photobum
join:2005-11-04
Fairborn, OH
| reply to AB
Nice link... but everybody doesn't run Windows OS. |
|
AB
Premium
join:2006-04-04
Leesburg, VA
| said by photobum :... but everybody doesn't run Windows OS. After much thought and consideration, I have decided to be in agreement with that statement.
I've got a buck that says Jedi Writer does, though. |
|
photobum
join:2005-11-04
Fairborn, OH
| |
|
Jedi Writer
Premium
join:2006-04-01
USA
| reply to thewolfman
said by AB :
It's no more difficult or complicated than anything else you do on the computer. But suit yourself. If you're interested, here is where you can download any version of Firefox that pleases you: » www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=firefox
By the way that is good multipurpose link for the future. |
|
Sir Raleigh
Premium,MVM
join:2001-07-31
Raleigh, NC
| Oracle, I've been lurking in the background, not wanting to throw in any more confusion, but I would like to ask a question, if you don't mind?
I'm not going to try to talk you into going back to Fx 2.0, so don't worry about that, this is just out of my own curiosity.
If you could, would you please tell, as best as you can, what type(s) of problem(s) you had with version 2?
This information could be useful to others in the future.
If you'd rather not, that's okay, too.
Thanks.
--
I used to know all this stuff! |
|
Jedi Writer
Premium
join:2006-04-01
USA
1 edit | After upgrading to 2.0 if I try to play the MSN video player from a video link on the MSNBC website main portal page the player loads and starts to play by beginning to unfold the MSN Butterfly symbol at which point it stops and freezes. If I click on any of the video links associated with the player's menu there is no response. BUT if I click on the upper right hand corner of the frame of the frozen video player where it says "Get more videos" it takes me to archived videos that if I click on them the MSN video player plays them. And if I expand the library selection if it includes any of the videos that were listed on the frozen MSN video player they play.
And yes I've downloaded Flashplayer 9 and installed it, uninstalled it and reinstalled it and so on to no effect.
All that changed was the upgrading to FireFox 2.0 which simultaneously coincided with the problem I've described.
I've since succesfully gone back to Firefox 1.5x but the same problem exists so I guess I can no longer lay the blame at the feet of FireFox.
By the way I really like FireFox. My only compmlaint about it in the past was it seemed like they were upgrading it every two weeks which required new plug-ins or extensions which was a hassle. They could make the upgrade a lot easier and user friendly IMO.
But overall I definitely preferred it to IE which until FireFox I had used since about 1998. But the newer versions of firefox outperformed ie--BUT IE 7 IS A BIG IMPROVEMENT OVERALL TO IE 6. IT HAS BUGS OF COURSE. AND WHY YOU MAY ASK AM I SHOUTING--I AM NOT--MY KEYBOARD IS ACTING UP AND WILL CORRECT ITSELF AFTER I REBOOT. (I HOPE)
Yep, reboot and all is well.  |
|
Sir Raleigh
Premium,MVM
join:2001-07-31
Raleigh, NC
| LOL about your keyboard... 
Thanks for your reply. I'll admit that playing video's, or not playing video's, I should say, has been one of the more popular topics here.
I'm sorry to hear that going back to 1.5.x.x didn't fix your problem.
If you'd like to try Fx again sometime in the future, feel free to post back and we'll try to help.
Thanks again for your reply.
--
I used to know all this stuff! |
|
Bharat
join:2006-10-28
Cypress, TX | reply to Jedi Writer
the fresh install guide works for rollbacks as well as upgrades and re-installs
--
webstandards.org |
|
mark_y_k
join:2004-06-30
Pound, VA | reply to Jedi Writer
what i did was uninstall 2.0 then i went to »oldversion.com/ and clicked on mozilla and downloaded 1.5.7 and it only took me a couple of minutes and all my bookmarks and extensions were still there |
|
Santa Fe
Visit www.ALZ.ORG
Premium,ExMod 2002-7
join:2000-08-22
Freight Yard
clubs:
·Mediacom
| You can also go here: »releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla···eleases/ to find older versions of Firefox.
Firebird or Phoenix builds anyone?
--
We run Folding@Home and Rosetta@Home |
|
fonzbear2000
Premium
join:2005-08-09
Saint Paul, MN
| or here: »www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=firefox
--
»never pay full price for high speed again!!! |
|
haertig
join:2000-12-31
Broomfield, CO
| reply to Jedi Writer
said by Jedi Writer :I am strictly a go to add/remove programs and click on remove things like IE 7. Bingo it is gone. And in its place is IE 6 and with all the settings and bookmarks I had on IE 6. Is the original question about "rollback" vs. "uninstall/reinstall"?
I haven't read every word or every post in this thread (I tend not to do that when things get nasty). So I apologize if this has alrady been covered.
With things like Firefox (a non-Microsoft product), you "uninstall" them and then "reinstall" them later if you want. After an "uninstall", you have nothing. Not the previous version, just nothing. The program is no longer there. If you want it there, or a previous version of it, you must "reinstall".
Microsoft has this concept of "rollback". When you get rid of the newer version, there remains the older version staring you in the face. There are probably two reasons for this. (1) Microsoft does not want you to get rid of their program, so steps are taken to keep it installed in some manner. Or (2) The program you are trying to get rid of, IE7 for example, is so tightly intertwined with the OS that you simply CANNOT get rid of it. Doing so would destroy the OS. So instead of a normal "uninstall", Microsoft has to provide a "rollback" instead, so you have some semblance of functionality left in your OS. Critics have argued that this "tight intertwining" is intentional, but unecessary, and intended as a way to maintain control. That is a different topic for a different discussion.
I don't imagine that there are too many non-Microsoft products that have a "rollback" capability. There are some of course, but I don't think it's the norm. |
|
I agree.