how-to block ads
|
upidstay
@bellsouth.net
| NOT-Neutrality? sarcasm: Run for the hills! The Communist left is all
but back in power again, along with tree huggers,
sin lovers, and baby killers. And now they will get a
chance to pass thier socialist one-world-internet
agenda.
Seriously, though even most well educated power users and
IT personell around the industry, even those with differing
political views know the real issue behind net neutrality is that the ISP's want to charge more for bandwith that is ALREADY PAID FOR. While I dont think that any certain political party or candidate will be that much better or worse than the other, in my opinion net neutrality is a no
brainer being that it is the only way to keep the status quo
"democratic nature" of the internet.QoS and tiering cannot
make up for bandwith, which the Telecoms are reluctant to provide (understandably, fiber ain't cheap). However right now at least probably no net neutrality legislation is needed as long as the status quo can be maintained. | |
|  
guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
 ·epix
| Re: NOT-Neutrality? said by upidstay :
sarcasm: Run for the hills! The Communist left is all
but back in power again, along with tree huggers,
sin lovers, and baby killers. And now they will get a
chance to pass thier socialist one-world-internet
agenda. IMHO that is not sarcasm, but the ugly face of reality. On a day when Democrats win control of the House and possibly the Senate, its ironic an omen appears in the Pennsylvania's daily lottery number on election day...666
»www.wnep.com right side column near bottom of page.
quote:
karlmarx
Finally, we can use bittorrent to it's full potential.
You go right on believing that. The biggest contributors to the elected Democratic liberals is Hollywood. All those who voted believing the Democrats will restore civil liberties, by repealing the Patriot ACT, Homeland Security ACT and end NSA wiretapping. Boy are you in for one helluva surprise. Because the Democrats voted for and were fully briefed on it and went along with it.
BTW: Thanks Pennsylvania voters for being so F&*king liberal, it's disgraceful.
To all voters every where, who elected so many liberal anti-gun politicians, your going to get what you deserve, and rightfully so.
--
Bass....the glue of rhythm and harmony...the heartbeat of the band.! Shaking the earth with deep,sonorous vibrations.The dark ominous thunder of an approching storm. | |
| | xrobertcmx
Premium
join:2001-06-18
Sterling, VA
clubs:  | Re: NOT-Neutrality? Look, we don't need a political debate here. Let's try and stay on topic.
--
4 More years and we won't have a country. | |
| | |
guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
·epix
| Re: NOT-Neutrality? said by xrobertcmx  :Look, we don't need a political debate here. Let's try and stay on topic. Almost every post in this thread involves politics,
so WTF
--
Bass....the glue of rhythm and harmony...the heartbeat of the band.! Shaking the earth with deep,sonorous vibrations.The dark ominous thunder of an approching storm. | |
| | | | | | | | | 
Fatal Vector
join:2005-11-26
| Re: NOT-Neutrality? "Most seemed to have more to do with neutrality or the net and less to do with calling 50% of the population misguided fools who would get their own for not supporting gun control.
Honestly I don't know if the Dems will do anymore with then the Republicans. I've always thought follow the money and you will find the crook."
I have news for you, slick. About 95% of the population is dumb, unthinking, emotion driven, lazy and greedy. A politician knows this, which is why they appeal to them.
Joe and Jane could give a damn less about network neutrality. All they care about is their porn, you tube or whatever dumb stuff trips their trigger.
The only ones who do, really, are geeks and professional whatevers like those that inhabit this site
And, yes, it is generally true that if you follow the money you eventually find truth. | |
| | | |
|
·
·