guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
 ·epix
| reply to xrobertcmx
Re: NOT-Neutrality?
said by xrobertcmx  :Look, we don't need a political debate here. Let's try and stay on topic. Almost every post in this thread involves politics,
so WTF
--
Bass....the glue of rhythm and harmony...the heartbeat of the band.! Shaking the earth with deep,sonorous vibrations.The dark ominous thunder of an approching storm. |
|
xrobertcmx
Premium
join:2001-06-18
Sterling, VA
clubs: 
 ·Comcast
·EarthLink
| Most seemed to have more to do with neutrality or the net and less to do with calling 50% of the population misguided fools who would get their own for not supporting gun control.
Honestly I don't know if the Dems will do anymore with then the Republicans. I've always thought follow the money and you will find the crook.
--
4 More years and we won't have a country. |
|
Fatal Vector
join:2005-11-26
| "Most seemed to have more to do with neutrality or the net and less to do with calling 50% of the population misguided fools who would get their own for not supporting gun control.
Honestly I don't know if the Dems will do anymore with then the Republicans. I've always thought follow the money and you will find the crook."
I have news for you, slick. About 95% of the population is dumb, unthinking, emotion driven, lazy and greedy. A politician knows this, which is why they appeal to them.
Joe and Jane could give a damn less about network neutrality. All they care about is their porn, you tube or whatever dumb stuff trips their trigger.
The only ones who do, really, are geeks and professional whatevers like those that inhabit this site
And, yes, it is generally true that if you follow the money you eventually find truth. |
|
