  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| Muni-WiFi a technological dead end
From a technological standpoint, early attempts show that deploying and maintaining a network of acceptable quality is a challenge{to put it mildly}. The model of ad-supported Web access is a leap into the unknown, and Wi-Fi technology could be leap-frogged by the increasing data speeds of cellular and eventually WiMax, which promises speed and coverage advantages.
"One major lesson I hope cities have learned by now is that a wireless network for which nobody is paying isn't viable," says Craig Fifer, the city's e-government manager. "If the government pays, it's usually inappropriate. If ads pay, it's usually unreliable. Another technical limitation is coverage, since public Wi-Fi generally won't reach inside or above the second floor of buildings.
Technical problems can dog a project regardless of scale or resources. Chaska, Minn., population 18,000, had to upgrade its town-owned Wi-Fi network after two years of operation, moving from the 802.11b standard equipment to the faster 802.11g to handle network volume.
In just a year or two, many cities may look to WiMax technology to provide that kind of broad coverage, as that technology becomes more prevalent and mature. Only some of the Wi-Fi equipment sold today will be compatible with WiMax, so cities might be in for an unpleasant surprise. All these planned muni WiFi roll-outs are almost obsolete before they are completed. Their coverage is poor; their ongoing financial feasibility is suspect; and needed upgrades will probably be postponed or dropped entirely. Somehow, I don't think all the wireless providers like Sprint or Verizon have much to worry about. -- -- My BLOG My Web Page |
  tschmidt Premium,MVM join:2000-11-12 Milford, NH
·Hollis Hosting
·Verizon Online DSL
·Fairpoint Communic..
| I was involved in researching a muni FTTP project several years ago.
WiFi coverage and capacity is a big issue. It is one thing to put a hotspot in a retail store and quite another to blanket a large outdoor area. As others have pointed out WiFi was developed as a wireless LAN, that is a very different animal then wireless WAN. WiMax is interesting but so far largely vaporware.
In our case the business model was to provide wireless hotspots in selected areas and make access contingent on being a FTTP subscriber. Basically give people untethered access in parks and other public places.
The project never got very far so we had not dealt with the larger and more difficult issue of guest coverage and how to manage it. Figuring out how to pay for these services is always a challenge. Taxpayers not interested in the service rightly complain about subsidizing someone elses toy. At the same time data access has much in common with other utilities and will become an indispensable service in the future.
We need to figure out a public/private model that provides ubiquitous high-speed data access while at the same time encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship. A tough challenge.
/tom |