how-to block ads
|
N3OGH
Bear patrol must be working like a charm
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Eliminating local franchises eliminates local pol graft You make a valid point, when it comes to greedy local politicians and franchise agreements, but...
I would sure as hell rather see my franchise tax go to my local municipality, where I can show up to the township meetings (and I do) and gripe about how the people who are spending the money (the township supervisors) are spending it.
With a national franchise, all that money goes to DC. It's just another drop in the bucket for them. More cash to study the mating habits of the duck billed cockroach, or to build a bridge to nowhere....
--
Never ask what sort of a computer a guy drives. If he's a Mac user, he'll tell you. If not, why embarrass him? -Tom Clancy | |
|  
yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH
| Re: Eliminating local franchises eliminates local pol graft said by N3OGH  :You make a valid point, when it comes to greedy local politicians and franchise agreements, but... I would sure as hell rather see my franchise tax go to my local municipality, where I can show up to the township meetings (and I do) and gripe about how the people who are spending the money (the township supervisors) are spending it. With a national franchise, all that money goes to DC. It's just another drop in the bucket for them. More cash to study the mating habits of the duck billed cockroach, or to build a bridge to nowhere.... They're gonna do that shit anyway. Woulnd't you rather see the possibility of competition?
--
Wiki Wiki
Laughter is the closest distance between two people. --Victor Borge
"Our politicians help the terrorists every time they use fear as a campaign tactic." -- Bruce Schneier | |
| | 
Alpine
Premium
join:2000-01-11
Atlanta, GA
1 edit | Re: Eliminating local franchises eliminates local pol graft said by yock They're gonna do that shit anyway. Woulnd't you rather see the possibility of competition? That's essentially my take on this. I really don't care where the money goes, since it's going to go "somewhere," as long as deployment can be accelerated.
Adam | |
| | RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission
| Yeah, the competition is to see who can pay the biggest bribe to lock everyone else out. What is the difference between that and some of the local franchises? I would rather have the local franchise to keep the money local to be wasted locally, not for some fat cat in DC to waste it on something I will never see like a study on how steak and lobster in the private politicians club in DC for a below cost price at taxpayer's expense is good for America. (Wait, they do not do a study, they just take the money and go eat)
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
| 
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| said by N3OGH :You make a valid point, when it comes to greedy local politicians and franchise agreements, but... I would sure as hell rather see my franchise tax go to my local municipality, where I can show up to the township meetings (and I do) and gripe about how the people who are spending the money (the township supervisors) are spending it. With a national franchise, all that money goes to DC. It's just another drop in the bucket for them. More cash to study the mating habits of the duck billed cockroach, or to build a bridge to nowhere.... Actually the national law in Congress sets aside 5% of franchise tax to go to the local community. The money doesn't go back to Washington,DC. Then the local community can do with it as they see fit.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
| |
N3OGH
Bear patrol must be working like a charm
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs | Re: Eliminating local franchises eliminates local pol graft If that's the case, then I support it.... | |
| | 
SRFireside
join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX
| said by TKJunkMail : Actually the national law in Congress sets aside 5% of franchise tax to go to the local community. The money doesn't go back to Washington,DC. Then the local community can do with it as they see fit. 5% seems like a paltry sum, especially if a local community takes in much more from the local franchise fees. Plus what happens to local programming? State and federal franchises give little incentive for providers to cater to the actual local community. | |
| | | 
fredlydeadly
@sbc.com
| Re: Eliminating local franchises eliminates local pol graft said by SRFireside :said by TKJunkMail : Actually the national law in Congress sets aside 5% of franchise tax to go to the local community. The money doesn't go back to Washington,DC. Then the local community can do with it as they see fit. 5% seems like a paltry sum, especially if a local community takes in much more from the local franchise fees. Plus what happens to local programming? State and federal franchises give little incentive for providers to cater to the actual local community. Where do you think that money comes from? It isn't like the cable/telcos reduce their profit margins - they just boost what you pay to pass the additional cost through. | |
| | | |
SRFireside
join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX
| Re: Eliminating local franchises eliminates local pol graft said by fredlydeadly :
Where do you think that money comes from? It isn't like the cable/telcos reduce their profit margins - they just boost what you pay to pass the additional cost through.
And this makes a difference, how? Those fees will be in your bill whether it comes from a local franchise fee or a national one. I'm talking about how much of that fee actually goes to your community. | |
| | | |
|
