Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Latest AV results from av-test.org
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
privacy tips and tutorials »
« Pancakes not worth personal info  
AuthorAll Replies

Wai_Wai
A Guy Who Enjoys Thumb-Up

join:2004-07-30


2 edits
reply to bellgamin
Re: Latest AV results from av-test.org

said by bellgamin See Profile :

Could this be the reason why WebWasher did so well, I wonder?
It is because WebWasher uses AntiVir engine in this test, as someone told you in the previous post.

Now why does WebWasher score higher than AntiVir? One reason I could think of is "Webwasher will report every UPX packed DLL as suspicious". Since this testbed only contains malware (no test about the accuracy of the scan result), Webwasher can detect every such malware while AntiVir can't. This may explain the discrepancy.

By the way, people should take the accuracy of the scan result into account. Theoretically an antivirus which flag everything as malicious can score 100% in this test, but this antivirus is totally useless in reality. Thus products with high number of false-positive should be used with care (so as to avoid deleting any innocent files). Here are the products with considerably more false positives:
- Dr.Web
- Fortinet
- VBA32

[Source: av-comparatives.org, research in VirusTotal and Jotti VirusScan]

Also note that some unheard AV products may be simply the clones of other well-known AVs. They either use one or multiple scan engines from other well-known AV (eg AVK, F-secure, TrustPort, Webwasher).
--
If you think my post is awesome, please vote for me
If it's thread (created by me) -> Simply click on "Topic functions : thumbs up, news-worthy".
If it's reply -> click on the "thumb-up" icon under my reply.
I enjoy seeing a lot thumb-ups around me!

RobertLudlum

join:2005-01-20
656456

said by Wai_Wai See Profile :

said by bellgamin See Profile :

Could this be the reason why WebWasher did so well, I wonder?
It is because WebWasher uses AntiVir engine in this test, as someone told you in the previous post.

Now why does WebWasher score higher than AntiVir? One reason I could think of is "Webwasher will report every UPX packed DLL as suspicious". Since this testbed only contains malware (no test about the accuracy of the scan result), Webwasher can detect every such malware while AntiVir can't. This may explain the discrepancy.

lol. Webwasher uses two engines, Antivir and their own private one. That's why they scored a touch better.
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Securityprivacy tips and tutorials »
« Pancakes not worth personal info  


Sunday, 29-Nov 20:21:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [81] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]
· question about Asus WL520GU with DD-WRT VOIP Generic [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· Adding a subpanel - Recommendations? [Home Repair & Improvement]