ninjatutle
Premium
join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA | reply to matrix3D
Re: Bye Fiber
Yeah but your house could blow up by an installer trying to run new cable.
»Botched Comcast Install Blows Up House |
|
matrix3D
join:2006-09-27
Deep River, CT | reply to ninjatutle
But wireless will give us all cancer.  |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to jmcaruso
Very true...the article doesn't state how much spectrum capacity is required for 280Mbps. Current CDMA2000 technologies require 1.25MHz channels (1up/1down).
quote:
UMB would use MIMO and SDMA in order to provide greater capacity and coverage, CDG said
According to CDG this could mean using 20MHz of spectrum (paired) for 280Mbps.
»www.cdg.org/technology/3g_umb.asp
# Flexible spectrum allocations
* Scalable, non-contiguous and dynamic channel (bandwidth) allocations
* Support for bandwidth allocations up to 20 MHz in 1.25 MHz blocks |
|
jmcaruso
join:2001-09-07
Rowley, MA | reply to voyager6868
I think the cited speeds are per cell tower, and it gets divided up by the number of active users. FTTH will still be plenty useful... |
|
Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.
join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| reply to voyager6868
Well, Sprint supposedly isn't going the greatest at the moment...
Perhaps they could slowly start cutting off all their voice customers, and convert all their towers to data only, increase the backhaul to each tower significantly, then institute Revision B nationwide to become the Nation's first and largest nationwide wireless broadband provider. Man, if they did that, it'd make the rural peeps drool all over the place... |
|
ninjatutle
Premium
join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA | reply to voyager6868
Yep, I guess thats why AT&T isn't putting all of their eggs into the fibre.
All of these crybabies on here don't seem to understand wireless is the future. |
|
voyager6868
join:2003-01-29
Lynnwood, WA | Fiber to the home is kind of useless if you can do 280Mbps over the air. |
|
