PetePuma
How many lumps do you want
Premium,MVM
join:2002-06-13
Arlington, VA | reply to lutful
Re: m0n0wall 1.3b1 released - FreeBSD 6.2 RC1
You also can run m0n0 on a 16 MB CF card - pfSense has a much bigger footprint. |
|
lutful
Premium
join:2005-06-16
Ottawa, ON
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to DaSneaky1D
This is my take on these two "related" open source projects:
pfSense is definitely better for faster X86 CPU boards since it offers many more features. But m0n0wall is faster and simpler on slower X86 CPU on WRAP or Soekris used by many WISPs.
I am expecting m0n0wall 1.3 to handle 2 Atheros on WRAP 233Mhz but have to confirm with some field tests over the holidays. |
|
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou | reply to sporkme
I thought I was posting this in the WiSP forum. I've already asked a mod to move it.
--
:: my trivial ramblings :: |
|
sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| reply to DaSneaky1D
FWIW, pfsense (a fork of m0n0) has been running 6.x from the get-go.
»www.pfsense.com/
Of course it can talk to a Cisco VPN server. Not sure how else either of these posts relate to Cisco though.  |
|
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
·Charter Pipeline
| Just a heads up to you all running m0n0. This new beta uses FreeBSD 6.2 RC1, so it actually has usable support for wireless cards.Also, m0n0wall can now be booted completely from USB (thumb) drives.
I plan on updating tonight and will report any problems.
--
:: my trivial ramblings :: |
|
