Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Approves Franchise Reform in Partisan Vote » The only time I wax conservative...
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
426
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
New rulings don't apply to statewide franchise areas »
« Can anyone find the order?  
AuthorAll Replies


Anoni

@swbell.net
The only time I wax conservative...

...is here -- I'm tired of greedy 'lil 'burbs holding up progress. Yeah baby.


jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:

said by Anoni :

...is here -- I'm tired of greedy 'lil 'burbs holding up progress. Yeah baby.
If you truly 'wax conservative' you'd be mad at this decision as another federal government preemption of local authority.

The 10th Amendment was written for a reason.


Albatross6

join:2000-12-22
Dallas, TX

So was the commerce clause and the delivery of data (including a dtv signal) that originates in CA and is piped to Nebraska (or anywhere else) is obviously interstate commerce.

The 10th amendment is inapplicable since the power was already granted to congress.

The cable companies should have thought of this approach years ago. Don't fault the telecoms for pursuing an efficient approach to avoid municipality power-grabs.


jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:
Local control of the local right-of-way is a power grab?


Albatross6

join:2000-12-22
Dallas, TX

Once the ROW has been granted (which it has to the telecoms since they are running the data over existing cables) to require some sort of service to the city, e.g., filming the city's arrival of santa clause, is certainly a power grab.

How is this not interference in interstate commerce?


jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:


2 edits
AT&T and Verizon are stringing all sorts of new infrastructure in the ROW.

Where is the precedence for existing infrastructure to give unlimited access for anything new for all time, especially service which is under a different title in the Communication Act?

Who's going to pay the cities to defend themselves from the cable companies who will sue the city violating the Cable Act by not granting a franchise?

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to Anoni
said by Anoni :

...is here -- I'm tired of greedy 'lil 'burbs holding up progress. Yeah baby.
Yeah, until they don't deploy in your area.
Forums » FCC Approves Franchise Reform in Partisan VoteNew rulings don't apply to statewide franchise areas »
« Can anyone find the order?  


Sunday, 08-Nov 21:45:13 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· for all the bell haters out there. [TekSavvy]
· Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]