brianiscool
join:2000-08-16
Miami, FL | reply to insomniac84
Re: If you have nothing to hide.
Companies like Blizzard should not offer bitorrent in the first place. People are paying a lot of money per month and the company should provide direct download access instead for the patches. |
|
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
 ·Charter Pipeline
| You know, I actually agree with you. Bandwidth concerns have become a thing of the past since Amazon started offering their S3 service.
True, you have to pay, but the burden is no longer on your customers to support.
--
:: my trivial ramblings :: |
|
insomniac84
join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
| reply to brianiscool
I agree with that fully. Users should be getting something for free if they are using a paid service via bittorrent where they give up their upload bandwidth for the business. But that doesn't give ISPs the right to get to choose the business models of other businesses. That's monopoly control at it's finest. |
|
kahunanull
join:2006-05-28
Portland, ME | reply to DaSneaky1D
Actually, Amazon's S3 service failed miserably this season when Amazon's own deals led to their services crashing when the XBOX 360 special went live. The "instant bandwidth, and processing power" never materialized and POOF there went Amazon. |
|
