plk
bo may sleep in loft
Premium
join:2002-04-20
Ogden, IA
| reply to Topmounter
Re: NO! NO! NO! NO!
But isn't that still regulation??? Can you define competitive markets???? That in itself is a regulation nightmare waiting to happen. Not to mention all the lobbing it would cause and money wasted that could go into the network.
The Bells can do just about what ever they want. They can start a new Internet and call it what ever they want and offer what ever they want. They just can't take what is already here and free for the most part and make it their own private toll booth.
The easiest way is what we have now. Net Neutrality...... it just isn't law and it should be.
--
Thermaltake 2000a/Asus P4C-e/p4 3.4/ocz3500 2x512/WD.2x200g/raptor2x74 raid 0/ATI 9600/APC sua 1500/Logitech z-680/ Samsung 213t LCD/MX 1000 |
|
Topmounter
Sent By Grocery Clerks
join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO | reply to plk
Net neutrality should only apply in non-competitive markets.
I'd rather see cable, telco and wireless compete instead of having the government telling them what service they can and cannot offer. |
|
plk
bo may sleep in loft
Premium
join:2002-04-20
Ogden, IA
| This merger should not go through without Net Neutrality forever. I really don't want the Internet looking like a cable provider. These folks will destroy the Internet no if's and But's about it.
If the Bells want to go into the TV business....let them.....and they can use what ever protocol they want. But the sure the Hell are not going to run it over the Internet and block the net or degrade it like they desire.
Net Neutrality is life and death for the Internet.
Looks like we better keep calling and writing congress.
--
Thermaltake 2000a/Asus P4C-e/p4 3.4/ocz3500 2x512/WD.2x200g/raptor2x74 raid 0/ATI 9600/APC sua 1500/Logitech z-680/ Samsung 213t LCD/MX 1000 |
|
