bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus
| reply to insomniac84
Re: why?
said by insomniac84  :Well it should be about delivering video the best way, and iptv over dsl isn't one of them. Agreed...
--
Prove it... |
|
Nanoprobe
Crunching in subspace
Premium
join:2003-05-11
Crab Nebula
clubs: 
 ·Skype
·magicjack.com
 ·AT&T Southeast
| reply to insomniac84
said by insomniac84 :Why would anyone want to be on top of this list if better services like fios don't count? Exactly! DARGAS. Next subject please.
--
Resistance is Futile |
|
insomniac84
join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN | reply to bmn
Well it should be about delivering video the best way, and iptv over dsl isn't one of them. |
|
bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus | reply to insomniac84
Because FIOS isn't IPTV, plain and simple... Period, end of discussion. This isn't about internet access, this is about video over IP.
--
Prove it... |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to insomniac84
Bragging rights ?
Well, its not a whole lot to brag about, however, if AT&T uses IPTV/DSL as a stepping stone to IPTV/FTTH then its no big deal.
POTS/DSL --> POTS/VDSL2+ --> FTTH is a 'decent' plan as its phased and cost can be controlled.
POTS/DSL --> FTTH is big change.
I do agree that replacing POTS with FTTH will save in the long run, however, a large deployment isn't cheap, especially from the node to the home.
The biggest change that is relatively cheap to deploy is bringing fiber to the node. The node to home is not so cheap. Since AT&T is reusing DSL/POTS its a way to redeploy. DSL is typically lower cost service than HSI over cable and fiber, and thats what they're using. Having 3Mbps at $25/month isn't bad. |
|
insomniac84
join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
1 edit | Why would anyone want to be on top of this list if better services like fios don't count? |
|
