republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Can AT&T Just Ignore New Concessions? » Hogwash
Uniqs:
82
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Enough Said »
« Of course they can  

major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:


2 edits

Hogwash

While AT&T did offer some additional concessions to squeeze through the AT&T BellSouth merger, Kevin Webach (via Techdirt) points out that the post-merger statements by Republican commissioners hint that they may not require the company to actually adhere to them. According to the statement, Tate and Martin believe that "while the Democrat Commissioners may have extracted concessions from AT&T, they in no way bind future Commission action. Thus, to the extent that AT&T has, as a business matter, determined to take certain actions, they are allowed to do so."
Which is a load of bullshit because of the letter of commitment the telco filed with the FCC wherein it promises to to observe Net Neutrality principles for at least 30 months thereafter the Merging Closing Date.

According to AT&T's letter, the merged company:

"… commits that it will maintain a neutral network and neutral routing in its wireline broadband Internet access service. This commitment shall be satisfied by AT&T/BellSouth's agreement not to provide or to sell to Internet content, application, or service providers, including those affiliated with AT&T/BellSouth, any service that privileges, degrades or prioritizes any packet transmitted over AT&T/BellSouth's wireline broadband Internet access service based on its source, ownership or destination."

Whatever fantasyland Tate & Martin are living in, they cannot simply ignore the stipulations spelled out in the 20 pg concession letter they filed with the FCC as a condition for approval.

Addendum

Consumer effects of AT&T/BellSouth Merger

--
The Toll


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Hogwash

Sure they can.

They are ignoring many requirements of TA'96, some of them explicitly through "forebearance" and some of them implicitly, so ignoring some "commitment" that Ed Whitacre had some toady write up is an easy task....

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » Can AT&T Just Ignore New Concessions?Enough Said »
« Of course they can  


Saturday, 05-Dec 15:18:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [127] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [99] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]