HiVolt
29
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
clubs:
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to acadiel
Re: Apple to charge to unlock 802.11n
said by acadiel  :This patch is going to wind up on so many websites so fast that its going to be funny... I wonder if they are gonna get their legal department hunting those down who post it on websites.
It'll probably cost them more than the revenue they will get from the patch, heh.
--
I ignore all ignorant posts. |
|
Coma
neuro anomalist
Premium
join:2001-12-30
Nirvana-Land
clubs:
| reply to acadiel
said by acadiel :This patch is going to wind up on so many websites so fast that its going to be funny...
. . . . But they still have to put it into the fine print to make it legal in the eyes of Big Brother.
|
|
acadiel
Keep trying - don't give up
Premium
join:2002-06-22
Bloomington, IL | reply to 93254336
This patch is going to wind up on so many websites so fast that its going to be funny... |
|
93254336
Weapons Of Masturbation
Premium
join:2001-10-20
| reply to sporkme
said by sporkme :said by The Dv8or :The idea is that the software is not currently capable of doing things it can do in the future. The upgrade is an add-on after the fact in a development of doing something better, but you're not specifically hiding a current feature. It's also much more difficult to prove in software than it is in hardware. How about firmware updates on DVD burners that increase the max burn speed? Drive is advertised as 2x, update makes it 4x. Here's an idea: how about a $5 upgrade fee for the patch which will change the US Daylight Saving info to the new 2007 dates?
- Dan
--
"That which does not kill us makes us stranger."
|
|
nolancj
join:2002-06-30
Long Beach, CA
| reply to RIRWIN1983
said by RIRWIN1983 :then how did directv get away with sellng its hr-20 hddvr that had the connections for ota,network,ect... but did not work because they needed to be enabled via software updates once they got the outher bugs fixed. This isn't really a debate of one company vs. another. It's how Apple has decided to manage the situation given their accounting policies. Maybe DTV has different policies. SOX does leave a lot up to interpretation by a given entity.
Also, DTV could also maintain that the monthly fee you pay for services is a subscription type service and hence entitles you to maintaining current product sets relative to hardware. |
|
russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA
| reply to ptrowski
quote:
Tell you what. Tell all those people that lost their retirement funds from Enron, etc that SOX is not a good idea, that there needs to be compliance.
If people got cheated by New York's "Crazy Eddy" and the feds responded by nuking New York, would you blame the nuking on Crazy Eddy? |
|
sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| reply to The Dv8or
said by The Dv8or :The idea is that the software is not currently capable of doing things it can do in the future. The upgrade is an add-on after the fact in a development of doing something better, but you're not specifically hiding a current feature. It's also much more difficult to prove in software than it is in hardware. How about firmware updates on DVD burners that increase the max burn speed? Drive is advertised as 2x, update makes it 4x. |
|
ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
clubs:
 ·VOIPo
·Metrocast Communic..
·AT&T DSL Service
·ViaTalk
| reply to JimF
said by JimF :said by nolancj :Stupid, but blame the accountants, Enron, MCI, and all the others that SOX came from. Put the blame where it belongs. Sarbanes-Oxley came from Congress, and the President that signed it. Riiiightt.....And Congress just came up with it for no reason?
Tell you what. Tell all those people that lost their retirement funds from Enron, etc that SOX is not a good idea, that there needs to be compliance.
Wow, now Apple can blame the president for charging $5. 
--
"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org/index.htm |
|
JimF
join:2003-06-15
Allentown, PA
| reply to nolancj
said by nolancj :Stupid, but blame the accountants, Enron, MCI, and all the others that SOX came from. Put the blame where it belongs. Sarbanes-Oxley came from Congress, and the President that signed it. |
|
russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA | reply to yabos
Parallels, Inc. is privately held, thus SOX doesn't apply to them.
Apple's unlikely to go private, but it's not impossible. They'd need some deep-pocket investors. |
|
tpeng
join:2003-01-30
Forest Hills, NY
clubs:
| reply to The Dv8or
$5 probably will barely (if at all) cover the transaction fees and administrative costs for setting up a system just to collect and account for these costs. In all likelihood, they'd lose money on the deal. It sounds as if this went up the wrong chain or someone raised an alarm from legal and given that they are currently under the SEC's magnifying glass for screwing up recently, they are not taking any chances.
Of course it's silly, and Apple has to know that it will get nothing but bad press out of it. In other circumstances, they probably would just release the software upgrade simply as adding "compatibility with the new Airport extreme", like the WPA upgrade. |
|
nolancj
join:2002-06-30
Long Beach, CA
| reply to The Dv8or
There are 2 things here:
1. Maintenance fees are how software companies (larger ones mostly) sell new features.
2. Small companies (like parallels) will fly under the radar with regards to these issues. They're also not a public company.
SOX has created a paranoia within companies, espeically those caught in finance scandals, stock option issues, revenue reporting problems, inventory tracking problems, etc.
SOX requires that adequate controls be put in place to manage ALL of the financial reporting within an organization, and requires the officers of the company to attest to their accuracy.
What that has done is put Finance in control of many, many companies. A BAD thing in my opinion. A few bad apples (Enron, MCI, etc), have ruined innovation and freedom in large public companies, in my humble opinion. |
|
The Dv8or
DSLReports Forums -- The Mouse House 2.0
Premium
join:2001-08-09
Danbury, CT
clubs:
| reply to yabos
The idea is that the software is not currently capable of doing things it can do in the future. The upgrade is an add-on after the fact in a development of doing something better, but you're not specifically hiding a current feature. It's also much more difficult to prove in software than it is in hardware.
--
You're so vain... I bet you think this post is about you. |
|
yabos
join:2003-02-16
Ingersoll, ON
| reply to nolancj
said by nolancj :SOX rules prohibit you from selling "future features" with an existing sale. For example, if I were to sell you a piece of software, I have to represent what it does TODAY. I cannot give you "future" features. Most Software companies work around this with maintenance fees. You basically cannot sell what you do not have. Then how do companies give free lifetime updates to their software? For example Parallels. You buy it once and you get updates for life. All the new betas are adding features that weren't in the first version and they can get away with it. |
|
Paladin
Sage of the light
join:2001-08-17
Chester, IL | reply to leXicon5
Re: Apple to charge to unlock 802.11n
They should just take Apple private already. |
|
Homunculus
Pipsquack
Premium
join:2000-12-14
Dar al-Harb
clubs: | reply to leXicon5
Gee, Apple finding another way of milking their customers. Well I'll be.
--
Islam is a hate crime: »www.thememriblog.org |
|
wilbilt
Pronto Resurrected
Premium
join:2004-01-11
Oroville, CA | reply to leXicon5
They distribute security patches for unadvertised future exploits at no charge...
--
We were taking a vote when the ground came up and hit us. |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to leXicon5
This move by Apple doesn't surprise me at all. |
|
