Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Webhosting » Domain name privacy
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Need link for site that has info on webhosts »
« Surpass Hosting Colocation?  
AuthorAll Replies


Brand0n
Premium
join:2007-01-31
Valencia, CA
reply to Surpass
Re: Domain name privacy

UPS Boxes are the best... i have had one in every state i have lived in


GilbertMark
Premium
join:2001-05-02
Gilbert, AZ
reply to decx
1 and 1 domains looks pretty good. Damn I'd save $45 a year transferring my .tv to them.

decx
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Vancouver, BC
·Bell Sympatico

reply to Surpass
Personally I think the requirement for the info is a bit much for personal users. It's fine way back when owners of domains were usually businesses and the prevalence of spammers/data skimmers were much lower. With the misuse of the WHOIS data of recent years, ICANN really should look at other approaches to protect it's registrants' info.

In the mean time, registrars gets to earn extra revenue by acting as proxy. IMO, this is one of the few areas 1and1 has got right. Despite their sometimes problematic customer service, they offer private domain registration included in their already low registration price.


Surpass
Premium
join:2004-10-01
Orlando, FL

reply to GilbertMark
The UPS mailbox sounds good to me. I was just looking for comments on how a P.O. box stacks up to a UPS box, and the only pro of the P.O. seems to be the cheaper price.

After seeing this comment, now even I want one:

"When I go to the post office I leave upset. When I go to the UPS Store I leave happy!"



At any rate, the chances of your domain name being blitzed are slim with either one.


AmeritecTech
Change we can believe in, 1922
Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
reply to GilbertMark
That's just an extra layer they don't want to have to do, I guess. Anyway, it was useful for getting spammers deleted.


GilbertMark
Premium
join:2001-05-02
Gilbert, AZ
·Cox HSI

reply to AmeritecTech
Thanks all for the quick input here.

Maybe I'll go with a UPS post office box since they give a non p.o. box address. This is ridiculous when you think about it because LEOs could go to the P.O. or the UPS store and get their records via warrant if they had to to determine who rented the box.
--
Got a V3 or a V3i or an L7? Want to get the most out of them? Check out my sites »hacktheV3.com and »hacktheV3i.com and »hacktheL7.com


AmeritecTech
Change we can believe in, 1922
Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX

reply to Surpass
Pretty easy to Google, but:

With encouragement from stakeholders in the intellectual property arena,(9) ICANN has attempted to improve the quality of information in the Whois database. As law enforcers, we support the use of the proposed Registrar Accreditation Agreement (Accreditation Agreement) to elicit a more active role for registrars in ensuring that the Whois database contains accurate contact information.(10)

Several measures contained in the Accreditation Agreement are particularly noteworthy. One essential provision, paragraph II(J)(7), requires a registrar to collect contact information in a number of categories from an applicant for a domain name, and specifies that the applicant's willful failure to provide accurate information may result in the termination of the registration. From a law enforcement perspective, the most critical information gathered is the name and physical address of the domain name holder, which is necessary to identify an alleged wrongdoer and facilitate service of process.(11)
»www.ftc.gov/os/1999/10/icann.htm

I have used this rule to get the domains of several spammer sorts deleted.
--
"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone Not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that ALWAYS come in legions."
-John Callari


Surpass
Premium
join:2004-10-01
Orlando, FL
reply to AmeritecTech
Can you tell us where this rule is posted exactly?


AmeritecTech
Change we can believe in, 1922
Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
reply to GilbertMark
No, must be a physical. PO's are not acceptable. You'll have to use Proxy if you want true protection.
Forums » Up and Running » WebhostingNeed link for site that has info on webhosts »
« Surpass Hosting Colocation?  


Monday, 30-Nov 05:18:54 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [82] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]