republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Networking » Load Balancing/multihoming/bonding/3 Nics
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
never installed ethernet...what to buy »
« wireshark TCP  
AuthorAll Replies


DaMaGeINC
The Lan Man
Premium
join:2002-06-08
Greenville, SC
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southeast

reply to Neo321
Re: Load Balancing/multihoming/bonding/3 Nics

You said USB, that really discredits this topic. USB and networking should never be mixed. Ewww. As others have said, this is not easy AT ALL. You will need ALOT of knowledge in Linux and advanced routing protocols. A simple dual wan router is the easiest and cheapest way to go.
--

Have a Networking problem or question? Stop by the Networking Forum and let us help you.

Neo321

join:2007-02-12

To DaSneaky1D ::
I didnt got your point, please explain it???

To Leathal ::
I am developing all this as per my usage and needs, I understand that your point of online banking is gud one but its not a requirement for me.
So, I want the system and know all its limitations...

To cdru ::
I am sorry if my words sounded harsh to you.
Actually I wrote like that because it seems a bit impossible, but I have to implement it at any cost.

To DaMaGeINC ::
Dont worry about USB lan cards, they simply act as a normal lan card after putting up the driver.
Even Suse 10.2 also have inbuilt drivers for usb cards, so its not a problem.
I am just using usb lan cards instead of ordinary lan card coz of limitation of ports on computer.
So, USB lan card isnt an issue, dont care about it, just consider it as an normal lan card.

To All ::
You might think that a pc wont support coz of power failure and system resources, so let me tell you one thing that after implementing all this, I ll start my linux system in shell mode(without any graphics), and in shell mode, even a PIII can serve whole of my network without any problem.
I am already using my system as a server for my whole network, but this time I want to merge all my input lines.

So guys, there are no limitation for my target, just think abt it , and make it possible....

Thanks ...

Rohit


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

said by Neo321 See Profile :

To cdru ::
I am sorry if my words sounded harsh to you.
Actually I wrote like that because it seems a bit impossible, but I have to implement it at any cost.
So you have to implement it at any cost, but you aren't allowed to buy hardware. Aren't those two mutually exclusive of each other?

To DaMaGeINC ::
Dont worry about USB lan cards, they simply act as a normal lan card after putting up the driver.
Even Suse 10.2 also have inbuilt drivers for usb cards, so its not a problem.
I am just using usb lan cards instead of ordinary lan card coz of limitation of ports on computer.
So, USB lan card isnt an issue, dont care about it, just consider it as an normal lan card.
We know what USB LAN cards are and that they can work, you just won't ever find a competent network administrator that would even suggest using a USB network card for production equipment in a business setting, let alone actually use one. A $5 generic PCI NIC is so much better then even the best USB NIC.

To All ::
You might think that a pc wont support coz of power failure and system resources, so let me tell you one thing that after implementing all this, I ll start my linux system in shell mode(without any graphics), and in shell mode, even a PIII can serve whole of my network without any problem.
I am already using my system as a server for my whole network, but this time I want to merge all my input lines.
We never doubted that a PC couldn't do the task. Many places do have a PC serving as a router. There just creates many more points of failures when you use a PC. It's even worse when you want to start using USB NICs. It also would be highly recommended NOT to use a production server also as your load balancer/router and firewall. Too many eggs in one basket.

So guys, there are no limitation for my target, just think abt it , and make it possible....
No, we can help you make it possible, but we won't make it possible for you. What specific question do you have?
--
Go Colts


DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
·Charter Pipeline


2 edits
reply to Neo321
said by Neo321 See Profile :

To All ::
You might think that a pc wont support coz of power failure and system resources, so let me tell you one thing that after implementing all this, I ll start my linux system in shell mode(without any graphics), and in shell mode, even a PIII can serve whole of my network without any problem.
I am already using my system as a server for my whole network, but this time I want to merge all my input lines.

So guys, there are no limitation for my target, just think abt it , and make it possible....
OK, it's still fairly early, so I may have taken the bolded text out of context, but you're reaaaally out of line. You don't come here and make demands. Period.

Second, members here are offering perfectly sound suggestions. It seems, though, that you haven't explained what you're trying to do in a clear manner.

Are you trying to use your server also as a firewall? If so, bad idea. Yeah, several Linux-based firewalls allow this, but a firewall is for network protection, not doing the dishes too. Let it serve it's dedicated purpose.

Are you trying have one server use multiple ISP's as fail over and load balancing all by itself?

I suggested PFsense because you can do load-balancing and failover with it. It will need to be used on a dedicated computer, but you can either add multiple NIC's to it to connect to different ISP's, or using a managed switch with VLAN capability, you can use 2 NICs, with one interface being the LAN and VLAN interfaces all facing the WAN.

With all the info give, now YOU can make it possible.

EDIT - I meant PFsense.
--
:: my trivial ramblings ::

Neo321

join:2007-02-12

To cdru ::
Yes, I have to implement it at any cost... hardware isnt a solution as I have seen only quad-wan supporting router.
So a software based solution is the right choice, as it ll support any number of ISPs.

To DaSneaky1D ::
Maybe I havnt explained it properly, coz I am a bit confused with terms like bonding, multihoming, etc... and all.

basically, in one line what I want is,
A computer which can act as a multi-wan router

I have found some software for this like pfsense, and clarkconnect.
I ll also take a look at ipsense too.

Thanks...
Forums » Up and Running » Networkingnever installed ethernet...what to buy »
« wireshark TCP  


Thursday, 03-Dec 15:07:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [129] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [75] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [47] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· PVP in wow today [World of Warcraft]
· CRTC hearing on Monday [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Patch 3.3 preperation [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]