Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Towns Fight AT&T Over Eminent Domain » Why can't they bury them?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« NIMBY  
AuthorAll Replies

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to dynodb
Re: Why can they bury them?

said by dynodb See Profile :

It's not "plain and simple" cost; you people sure have a way of beating a dead strawman.

RT's need to be accessed on a pretty regular basis- exactly how would you accomplish this with it buried underground? Keep in mind you'd need access all sides of the cabinet with room to work, while also keeping it protected from the elements and accessable even when there's a foot of snow on the ground, and providing for airflow for the fans in the Summer.

In order to do this, you'd need a very large hole... and then there'd be complaints about the 10 x 10 x 10 foot hole being dug in someone's yard.
So tell me then how can Verizon do FIOS without those boxes? I have it in my neighborhood and nothing that big is in my area and the cable junctions are smaller than the in-ground feed points for electrical service.

Thank you for proving my point. It would cost more to submerge the RT than do do it above ground.

ATT is trying to get off doing this the easy way. They either need more thought or a better plan. Until the higher ups have one of these on their property, then they need to be more attentive to the citizens they deploy to.

dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

FIOS, IPTV and cable broadband are completely different technologies with different infrastructure- you can't compare them.

Yes, it would be possible to put RT's underground, and yes it would be more expensive... but more importantly it's not terribly practical, especially considering the drawbacks (access to the RT, flooding, snow, etc) and that the only benefit is aesthetics.

Seriously, I doubt it even would occur to the telcos to put them underground. The company I work for has over 10,000 RTs and I've not once even heard the possibility of them being installed underground even mentioned, much less considered.


Clemcon

@ameritech.net
ATT in Michigan has several first generation RTs that are underground with very good access from ground level. 2nd generation units are all above ground in brick buildings/huts while the newest units are housed in above ground cabinets.
Forums » Towns Fight AT&T Over Eminent Domain« NIMBY  


Saturday, 05-Dec 02:59:43 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [88] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]