JimF
join:2003-06-15
Allentown, PA
1 edit | reply to cwh
Re: heh
But if it were worth it to run the children's programming before the requirement in order to earn the advertising revenue, they would have done it. The children's programming requirement can only reduce their incentive to run the sub-channel. |
|
morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs: | now why would they do that? seriously. the FCC wouldn't do it willy nilly. does it screw over cableco's somehow and benefit telcos? |
|
robertfl
Premium
join:2005-10-10
Mary Esther, FL
 ·Cox VOIP
1 edit | If I were to encounter a programme with E/I on it, it should be commercial free. Why the FCC is allowing commercials to be put in kid's programmes is beyond me.
What a way to get kids today introduced to "ads"
(skip)
(There misleading anyway)
Rob |
|
