RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
2 edits | reply to calvoiper
Re: Based on past history....
I'm not sure what disease Google is trying to cure, except for an aching desire to stick their nose into yet another business. They are hardly a charitable organization, and this is all about them making (even more) money.
How does the Google model address any perceived efficiency deficiency?
added: I read the proposal. It doesn't address much of anything. In fact the proponents trotted out all of the usual suspects to justify it: Rural deployment, lower cost of entry, "competition" with wireline carriers, etc. About the only thing I didn't see in that kitchen sink was "do it for the chil....dren".
Reed Hundt backs it. That's all the reason you need not to.
One funny aside, Google wants your Wireless device to participate in realtime auctions just to get on the network. Maybe that would alleviate some of the data cap nonsense...you keep bidding until you get a channel. Someone outbids you, you're offline.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
| I think Google is trying to address the weird combination of "Ph.D" and "NIH" (Not Invented Here) disease that gave us the super screwy PCS auctions, and has only slightly improved for subsequent frequency allocations.
I take no position on the Google proposal; my comments are limited to the "anything has to be better than what we've seen," approach.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | Granted, the Wireless Bureau's sky is definitely a different color than most, but I see nothing in Google's proposal that indicates any greater foothold in reality.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
