republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference? » True
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

reply to Transmaster
Re: True

said by Transmaster See Profile :

... and they are still fantasising the it will be the rural provider.

Yeah, and the really annoying thing is that they end up with "demo" projects that all use BPL for "last mile" connections in urban areas, while people don't realize that trying to use it over long distances in rural areas is a wholly different application.

Why is rural different? Well, when you are cramming a broadband signal down a wire designed for something other than broadband, there are significant losses with increasing distance. (Hint: consider DSL.) Additionally, there are transformers to consider, and the wire cable is even less suited to high-frequency transmission than twisted pair copper. (Yes, I know you thought that wasn't possible, but it is.)

Anybody got any results from any "long-haul" trials of BPL?

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

W1RFI

join:2003-05-12
Burlington, CT

> Anybody got any results from any "long-haul" trials of
> BPL?

In central VA, IBEC (a BPL manufacturer) and the local rural cooperative are running a commercial BPL deployment. They have reported that they are sending a BPL signal down 13 miles of overhead lines, using repeaters, of course. The repeaters are purportedly as much as a mile apart, but a deployment map that shows the locations of the units shows the typical 1000 feet or so as the spacing for most of them. I have no specific data on any testing, although having talked with a couple of users there, they have been generally satisfied with the performance. One user complained about reliability.

With rural lines, they can generally go farther along the line than they can do in urban environs. There are far fewer transformers, taps and other lossy configurations, if they can clean up all the power-line noise.

Ed Hare, W1RFI
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference?


Tuesday, 01-Dec 10:20:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [62] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [53] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [38] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [30] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [14] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [9] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
· [8] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [4] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· [News] Windows 8 Release 2012? [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Wind getting a little more aggressive [TekSavvy]