republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Network Burp » Design Issues on AT&T's side probably.
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
198
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Oh hi, I'm from the Internet. »
« That's what happened....  
AuthorAll Replies


NOCMan
Verizon Fios User
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Flower Mound, TX

Design Issues on AT&T's side probably.

My guess is AT&T has some stupid design for their AAA complex. In a ISP design as large as theirs it should be broken up into smaller areas so you do not lose the entire network. To have the entire network go down in this fashion for one device sounds like user error on the AAA database that killed off authentication for a specific device. The only problem I have with that is I've never heard of AAA being used to ban devices.

*shrug* sabotage

Course AT&T and company are known for network wide outages for various reasons.

Apple prides itself with being the best, but they locked their shiny new device down on possibly the worst cellular company in America.

I can agree with the price of the device. What I can not agree with is carrier locking. Apple could have sold in all their channel partners and would have received near or better product sales coverage than just sticking with AT&T. They could have negotiated features with the cellular companies as well. Let them handle customer service for cellular related features and have them handoff for anything else.

Never made sense how they rushed into this product and never stood back and checked their alternatives.
--
Mac Chatter
»www.macchatter.net

CMoore2004
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Jonesville, MI

Would they have gotten as much money, though? I'm willing to bet AT&T paid plenty to be the exclusive carrier. This isn't about being innovative. It's about money, as it always is.
--
Sprint Mobile Broadband PX-500 | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to NOCMan
quote:
In a ISP design as large as theirs it should be broken up into smaller areas so you do not lose the entire network.
You mean kind of like when Comcast went down nationwide a couple years back because someone had the bright idea to centralize the DNS servers?
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.

Devistater

join:2004-02-13
Clovis, CA
That only happened once???
Forums » AT&T Network BurpOh hi, I'm from the Internet. »
« That's what happened....  


Monday, 30-Nov 10:41:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [17] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [15] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [13] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· filling an in-ground pool [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Portable power for blackouts? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]