telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth
join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA | reply to ColorBASIC
Broadband costs
And people keep complaining about speed and costs associated with broadband. Do the same math on that service and compare it with wireless and dedicated circuits. |
|
ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA
4 edits | The point of the article is that it doesn't cost where SMS is concerned. The wireless providers are gouging customers big time, to the tune of $1,000.00 per MB. While I can understand that processing 6500 messages costs money even the biggest telco shill would acknowledge that processing the messages at .15-.30 each (since they charge both outgoing AND incoming) is a very high margin operation. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
3 edits | And the method of calculating cost by "Mobile Jones" is, as usual, bogus. The cost to the cell provider isn't on how many bytes are transmitted. The cost is based on use of a channel(from a limited number of channels) on the cell tower and how long it takes to grab the wireless spectrum, establish the connection, and then transmit, and then take down the connection. Every time someone sends a 20 byte message, all those costs are incurred and they far exceed the costs of some theoretical bandwidth usage. And then every time a new message is sent(20 secs later for example), the whole process starts all over again.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA | Yeah, and they're charging up to .30 per message. You want to claim that SMS isn't high margin?
--
Macintosh Users Group Serving the Inland Empire |
|
tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail  :And the method of calculating cost by "Mobile Jones" is, as usual, bogus. The cost to the cell provider isn't on how many bytes are transmitted. The cost is based on use of a channel(from a limited number of channels) on the cell tower and how long it takes to grab the wireless spectrum, establish the connection, and then transmit, and then take down the connection. Every time someone sends a 20 byte message, all those costs are incurred and they far exceed the costs of some theoretical bandwidth usage. And then every time a new message is sent(20 secs later for example), the whole process starts all over again. My my my! So costly! It's a downright miracle that people can make telephone calls with their cell phones!
practically instantaneous sending of a 20Byte message takes mere seconds, and doesn't hog the channel like talking does, yet talking on a cell phone is now bargain-bin stuff.
hrrrmmm....
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to ColorBASIC
Hell ya its high (this stuff, and forced signing of these kind of plans for discounts on devices) ticks me off. I've actually put a block on all SMS/MMS/Text on my phone. Email is much cheaper than MMS/SMS for the consumer.
On another note: I USED to have SMS/MMS when I was with the original AT&T Wireless - they offered unlimited FREE inbound messaging (SMS/MMS/txt email). I somehow don't think that the cost of this service has increased.
This is similar to AT&T charging $5/month for caller ID.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to ColorBASIC
said by ColorBASIC :Yeah, and they're charging up to .30 per message. You want to claim that SMS isn't high margin? Yes, it is high. Don't like the price, then don't use it. I have SMS blocked on my cellphone inbound and outbound.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to en102
quote:
This is similar to AT&T charging $5/month for caller ID.
EXACTLY! I have an unlimited data plan. Texting is crude joke compared to the phone's data capabilities. Getting charged for INCOMING texts is insulting / double dipping.
Competition seems to be slowly working to improve the situation, though. An extra $5/month now gets me unlimited M2M texts (over the 200 included with the $19.95 data/text plan). It's still highway robbery for what it is, but at least I don't have to cringe when I get an incoming spam text.
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams. |
|
ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA
| reply to TKJunkMail
Don't like it/don't use it is a different issue from whether or not it's a cash cow. I use SMS all the time for per personal and business so I use a prepaid option but it doesn't change the fact that AT&T is making a mint on it.
--
Macintosh Users Group Serving the Inland Empire |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| reply to en102
said by en102 :This is similar to AT&T charging $5/month for caller ID. I think it's more like $8.50 or $9.00 |
|
tamovies
join:2007-02-25
Rumford, ME |
I pay $7.75 |
|
