republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T West » pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[General] Any compelling reason to stay with SBC vs DSL extreme? »
« lost copper pair  
AuthorAll Replies


d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV
reply to bwclark
Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

Various email problems are being reported in the Southwest and Midwest forums as well so it isn't confined to the SFO area.

cbiggers

join:2000-08-10
San Luis Obispo, CA
clubs:

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Down 7/31/2007 10:24 PM

Post Date/Time 7/31/2007 10:24 PM
System Component Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)
Status Down
Detail Some customers in the 805 area code may be unable to browse the internet at this time. Our Network Engineering Team is aware of this issue and working to resolve this issue as soon as possible. Our estimated time of restoral is 12:30AM PT. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your patience
Start Date/Time 7/31/2007 10:23 PM
Estimated Repair Date/Time 8/01/2007 12:30 AM

»csc1.sbcis.sbc.com/systemstatus/···state=ca


mers2
Premium,MVM
join:2004-03-20
USA
clubs:
Thanks for the status report. My email has been sporadic most of the evening.
--
Team Discovery

Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA

For what it is worth, I found this message in the SBC Email newsgroup:

Ken Abrams wrote:

> For the past 36 hours or so, connecting to and getting mail from the
> "new" mail server has been painfully slow.......like 30 sec. to
> connect, 30 sec. to validate and ~15 to 30 each to retrieve small
> mail messages.
>
> What gives?

Disabling SSL on both smtp.att.yahoo.com and pop.att.yahoo.com incoming
brings speeds back to normal, watch that your ports are also get
changed back to 25 for outgoing and 110 for incoming.

I'll try going back to SSL everyday until they are fixed.
--
Patrick in IL.

I changed to the non-SSL ports and can now get email.

Eeyore


mers2
Premium,MVM
join:2004-03-20
USA
clubs:
Thanks. Also interesting as ATT made it sound like mail would be inaccessible without going through SSL.
--
Team Discovery

Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA

I just switched to ATT from another ISP a couple of weeks ago and I thought the same about using SSL. I have never used SSL before for email (I use it with my newsserver though) even during a previous stint using PacBell. As you said, they only give the information for using SSL which gives the impression that SSL is the only way email will work. I am now wondering why they want us to use SSL? Not that I am the suspicious type but ATT doesn't have a good reputation for customer support and service.

Eeyore


d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV

You need SSL email for security when you are traveling and accessing your email account across a networked owned by some other provider. This conversion to SSL email access goes hand-in-hand with the new free wifi access and their iPhone sales which can use wifi connections. Frankly, AT&T should have had SSL email access when they first offered wifi, but better late than never.

If you only access your email from your home DSL connection, then you really don't need the SSL protection.

bwclark

join:2004-07-05
Eureka, CA
Thanks!

Getting rid of SSL does improve the email!

Thanks to all who reported.

ELRefugee

join:2002-02-07
Scotts Valley, CA
·Comcast

reply to d_l
Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

said by d_l See Profile :

If you only access your email from your home DSL connection, then you really don't need the SSL protection.
How sure are you about this? I'd like to turn off SSL but don't want to run into nasty problems (i.e. not being able to receive or send email, and not being aware of it for days or weeks).


d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV

I don't have any inside knowledge about when or if Yahoo plans to discontinue the old 25/110 servers. They work now, but might not in the future.

Some people have just switched back to the old servers when these email problems started and the email works on the old servers, but there are also reports here at DSLR that indicate that the old servers are also having their share of access problems so this isn't something restricted to the new servers.

Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA

As I indicated earlier I couldn't even get onto the SSL server at all. So switching to the old (non-SSL) servers have at least gotten me on. I will wait to hear if/when the SSL server is back on line and also try the SSL settings every once in a while to see if they are up again. It would really be nice if ATT could let us know (not by email!) when the problem has been fixed. Tech support can't help. I once played with them for four days of no connection to the internet only to find that the whole area had been out; but tech support didn't know about it. And I don't know of any "status page" that would let me know about problems. The only one I found says that email is working normally. So it is up to the individual to fight his own battles.

Eeyore


d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV

I suspect that these problems are caused by Yahoo and not AT&T. Of course, AT&T is responsible because they chose Yahoo as a partner to manage the email service and apparently renewed the partnership this past spring.

Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA
For anyone that cares my SSL email is up again. And it seems like it is working more quickly than it did before it went down. Perhaps ATT/Yahoo has fixed the problem.

Eeyore
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T West[General] Any compelling reason to stay with SBC vs DSL extreme? »
« lost copper pair  


Saturday, 05-Dec 07:02:45 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [91] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]