  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| A wire is a wire is a wire
 Man-made noise |  Probable cause | |
Hi everyone,
This post is special, it demonstrates how wrong it may be to think that a wire is a wire is a wire...
Guess what happened on the 7th day of a test which i started a week ago: no noisy peak at congestion hours contrary to six previous records! Our house was empty so i immediately became suspicious about the kitchen phone but it didn't seem involved so i started to light up appliances as when somebody is preparing a meal and voilà!!! A nice peak finally showed up (A), my timing was correct but how could this wireless phone pick up so much noise from the micro-wave oven, the fluorescent lamp or even some power-hungry unit like the stove, etc? Mystery...

At the begining of each hour i powered everything, it turned out that the room for coïncidence shrank gradually after each test (B-H), noise peaks being added in a reproducible way! No doubt was allowed in my mind: the peaks still occured even with the phone completely disconnected so i concluded there was something quite wrong about the whole kitchen!

It was quite puzzling but one possibility remained which i thought was purely theoretical: there had to be some pretty strong 60 Hz noise involved so i walked into the room where the electrical panel is located and then i discovered some probable cause: despite the utmost disbelief i couldn't but notice all of the phone wiring including Bell's main were tightly packed against a trunk of electrical wires by three stiff #10 gauge stitches spaced from each other by nearly eighteen inches, my father's doing unless an electrician did it during his visit many months ago! Once i understood what was going on i disconnected all of the phone lines but that which goes to my MoDem, forgetting that Bell's main also coupled to 60 Hz noise... Instead of a faint peak i got one which was still strong, maybe because of improper loading, i wonder. Anyway, the next test was done with every line connected (just as usual) but with a twist: i took away the stitches to let all of this wiring loose. The peak didn't go away but my seven days test was over and it was late so i decided to sleep on it. My next move will be to redo the wiring so that no phone line is too close to high capacity 60 Hz electrical cabling. I hope that's all i must fix - More tests are required...
 |
|
  ArthurS Watch Those Blinking Lights Premium join:2000-10-28 Hamilton, ON
1 edit | reply to Bicephale Re: A wire is a wire is a wire
Yikes! What a mess! I hate to see the rest of the wiring!
A few points:
1. This is clearly an electrical code violation. Low voltage wiring (CATV, telephone, data) must be kept separate from high voltage (120 VAC) wiring!
2. Distance is your friend. For every doubling of distance, you noise goes down an order of magnitude (inverse square law here). I would try 6 inches separation at the very least, especially close to any significant current carrying conductors.
3. Be careful how you bundle/route your wires, particularly your data cables. Interference rejection is dependent on the consistency of the twist in the wire pairs. Using zip ties wrapped tightly around cable, routing cable around sharp corners, snagging wire into knots disturbs this twist pattern, making another point of entry for noise.
Let us know how you do!
Edit: I advise caution when dealing with a rat's nest of wire so close to AC power wiring! I would turn off AC power at the breaker panel before messing around there as a safety precaution! Under the right conditions, 120 VAC can kill! |
|
  Angelo_ The Network Guy Premium join:2002-06-18 | reply to Bicephale last visit the tech spliced the cable and made a huge mess (why my line can't sustain speeds at the new snr's |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to ArthurS Hi,
I increased the distance between the AC wiring and Bell's main (including its ground wire) but i left the internal phone lines in place. This is only a temporary configuration because it must go back in the wall somehow, eventually... The sampling rate being fifteen minutes these tests are very slow so i need to be very patient before i can evaluate my error rate reliably. I tought of using galvanized steel tubing because it would shield my DSL signal against electric and magnetic fields, i guess, but i prefer to evaluate simpler remedies for a while: maybe displacing the demarcation box would suffice to fix this issue permanently (i once had a 6 Mbps profile without much trouble, after all!) but then i'd probably need to displace the MoDem as well so i'm considering my alternatives. In the meantime, the possibility that a pair of stacked filters may not have enough punch at low frequencies to reject 60 Hz noise is a big concern, i might have to move the other phone lines for the duration of the next few tests to the very least! I wish i could do my little experiments using the SpeedTouch so i asked about Linux Live CDs (in the TekSavvy forum) but i doubt this will be sucesssful as it wasn't before.
After six months of wondering, my nightmare may be over, finally. I can now turn my frustration into a renewed motivation to improve the situation. It seems i got no choice but to grasp the opportunity to reduce the negative effects of cross-talk which are bound to grow while DSL gains more popularity!
 |
|
  ArthurS Watch Those Blinking Lights Premium join:2000-10-28 Hamilton, ON
| said by Bicephale :I tought of using galvanized steel tubing because it would shield my DSL signal against electric and magnetic fields, i guess, but i prefer to evaluate simpler remedies for a while: maybe displacing the demarcation box would suffice to fix this issue permanently (i once had a 6 Mbps profile without much trouble, after all!) but then i'd probably need to displace the MoDem as well so i'm considering my alternatives. In the meantime, the possibility that a pair of stacked filters may not have enough punch at low frequencies to reject 60 Hz noise is a big concern, i might have to move the other phone lines for the duration of the next few tests to the very least! I wish i could do my little experiments using the SpeedTouch so i asked about Linux Live CDs (in the TekSavvy forum) but i doubt this will be sucesssful as it wasn't before. After six months of wondering, my nightmare may be over, finally. I can now turn my frustration into a renewed motivation to improve the situation. It seems i got no choice but to grasp the opportunity to reduce the negative effects of cross-talk which are bound to grow while DSL gains more popularity! Even galvanized steel pipe is limited in its shielding from low frequency (60 Hz) electromagnetic fields. For best results, use rigid galvanized conduit (yes it's the most expensive kind of conduit and a pain to work with), and maintain a separation of at least 6 inches between high voltage and low voltage (which is required by code). In my specifications for high end commercial applications, I insist on one foot minimum, with both AC power and low voltage wiring being in separate conduits. In your situation, maximizing separation distance between the two is the cheapest and most cost effective solution for home use.
There is a lot to be gained from a neat installation. Starting over and doing it right sometimes is the best option. |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
|  60 Hz Noise - The AC coupling is actually revealed! |
Hi ArthurS, Hi Angelo168,
My numbers ain't as accurate over a few hours than they can be over a week so i better hold judgement based on them until enough records collect but the graphic shown above should speak for itself! This looks like some threefold improvement to me and it also suggests i only need to shield Bell's main as it turns out there was only a single phone instead of the whole wiring when the 18 h peak occured: i put back the original circuit for the 19 h peak so that's a strong indication that the stacked double filter setup does work at 60 Hz, after all... The single phone provided some loading and i put it at a good distance from the electrical panel in order to control noise pickup; there should have been a difference in the peak's amplitudes if the filters couldn't keep the 60 Hz noise away compared to the reference load. Great, i was quite concerned that having Bell's main besides of the home wiring in a close shielded space might actually couple them to a point that noise from the house wiring would end up being injected on the main line anyway - i just hope the impedance won't be affected too much once i'm done inserting the wires into the 1" sq. steel tube i've found! Well, at least there's no splice to deal with and the shielding tube just needs the length to be cut then i must get screw-pads added.
Piece of cake!
 |
|
  TakeTheFifth
join:2004-04-20 Anjou, QC
·ELECTRONICBOX
1 edit | I would be more concerned about interference riding the power lines than the 60Hz signal itself: hi-frequency junk (from electric motors, arc welders, amateur radio, etc). If have seldom seen nice and clean sine wave house power; If you live near any kind of garage, industry, machine shop (or are on the same power grid), and you suspect your problems are related to power line interference, they would be the culprit. At any rate, keeping phone lines away from power lines is a good idea (and if you can avoid having them run parallel, even better).
Some other sources of RFI: »cable-dsl.home.att.net/#RFI
Phil |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
1 edit | Hi Phil,
I'd like to use a more descriptive expression than just the term "60 Hz noise", which is quite vague, but my GNet only provides a simple diagnostic tool through 'DMT' and my SpeedTouch even less. In any case, i did suspect there was a wider problem this winter and i still do so the next step would be to put the MoDem on battery since that's all i can do about such external nuisance; when it comes to AM radio stations and storms i'm short of imagination but it wouldn't matter with these numbers, though:
Source: GNet BB0060B Date: 2007-Sep-8 Time: 11:27:52 Bits-per-Bin: 13 UpStream Bins: 6 to 31 inclusively DownStream Bins: 33 to 254 (idem) Tx Power Attm.: -1 dB Coding Gain: 7 dB
Up Time: 12:12:37 (43957 sec) Local CRC: 142/day (72/43957 sec) Remote CRC: 16/day (8/43957 sec) Local HEC: 90/day (46/43957 sec) Remote HEC: 4/day (2/43957 sec) Local Tx Power: 10.95 dB Remote Tx Power: 19.40 dB Local Line Atten.: 31.5 dB Remote Line Atten.: 29.0 dB Local SNR Margin: 18.5 dB Remote SNR Margin: 8.0 dB
Even a twelve hours record has little meaning here and i don't believe this is the end of peak rushes but that's nowhere near a thousand errors per day, (around four thousand until recently to be exact)!

As i wrote, the wires got to go back into the wall so there's no other way to manage with the limited space than by shielding Bell's main while the rest of the phone lines are moved by a few inches only.
Thanks for your link, i already feel apprehensive!
 |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to Bicephale
%20.JPG) Bell's Main #1 (with tape) |  .JPG/thumb.jpg) Bell's Main #2 (with tape) |  Bell's Main Outdoor Path | | |  Bell's Main Entry Point |  Iron Tubing - Arrival |  Iron Tubing - Corner |  Iron Tubing - Exit |  Demarcation Point |  Direct Connection Cable with Alligator Clips |
Hi,
I'm done shielding Bell's main line with a pair of 1" sq. tubes made of iron steel. Today was a nice sunny day so i also used the opportunity to gather images of the whole thing, starting from the roof!

It seems only two items might go wrong about this:
1) the tape around Bell's main on the roof because someone might have put it there for a reason...
2) the possibility that long tubes made of ferror- magnetic material such as these might happen to modify the characteristic impedance at the high DSL frequencies enough to disrupt the signal...

Euh... Oh, i almost forgot to mention that a part Hydro's main tubing appears to be made of plastic!
 |
|
  DKS Damn Kidney Stones Premium,ExMod 2002 join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON clubs: | Hmmmm. Bell would also not like you piggybacking on their ground. I believe it is supposed to be exclusive. |
|
  ArthurS Watch Those Blinking Lights Premium join:2000-10-28 Hamilton, ON
| said by DKS :Hmmmm. Bell would also not like you piggybacking on their ground. I believe it is supposed to be exclusive. Although this situation seems unique, any form of metallic "conduit" should be bonded to ground, this is a code requirement. All grounds must be all bonded together at the service entrance--this includes the main ground electrode for the building's power, along with the grounding conductor from the lighting arrestors for any telephone or cable TV/antenna that's penetrating to inside the building. |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24 | reply to DKS No problem, i can move the tubing ground to a 2nd block in order to stick to the book. |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
2 edits | reply to ArthurS
 Bell's Main with Tape - Front View | |  Bell's Main with Tape - Bottom View |
Hi ArthurS,
Yeah, that's tape all right! Tissue tape i'd say.

A technician working for Bell explained to me that he could see a high-impedance short (my own words) across the line this winter. The problem resolved by itself and didn't show up until recently when i noticed, once again, that pulse hammer-dialing "9" temporarily fixed my DSL connection which remained dead for hours otherwise... I suspected that some chemical reaction was involved, it seemed like the successive 40 volts pulses caused a faulty section of the telephone line to depolarize but none of us had the least clue where it was taking place. The more i look at this tissue tape the more i wonder: after years of exposition to the elements it could be collecting moist, a disaster waiting to happen.

I wonder if it's standard procedure at Bell to use tissue tape in this manner since i'd have expected to find a completely different type of protection!
 |
|
  DKS Damn Kidney Stones Premium,ExMod 2002 join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON clubs: | Is it paper tape or cotton-based hockey tape? |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Hi DKS,
I haven't got a chance to reach it so far, meaning this may be nothing more than a form of protection against abrasion - which makes me somewhat worried nonetheless: was it preventive or curative when a guy decided to put it there years ago?... I don't like how it appears to change shape and direction, if that's a splice i wouldn't bet on the odds that whoever did this he had a soldering iron handy and a helper down below, to disconnect the power right before he got ready to touch one of the wires. My photographs are inconclusive but my instinct tells me someone will have to look under the tissue tape because, from the looks of it, there's very little silicone-based sealant covering that joint if any.

Well, the situation could be worst: one of Bell's employees might actually have showed up while this detail was still remaining unnoticed. Lucky me...
Anyway, i can't afford not to be curious about it!
 |
|
  ArthurS Watch Those Blinking Lights Premium join:2000-10-28 Hamilton, ON
| reply to Bicephale With the way things were wired inside your house, I'd say this tape is very suspect. If it is simply being used to prevent abrasion, I don't see any harm done, though surely there's a better way to secure the wiring to the house without having abrasion problems. Looking back at earlier pictures, I don't like seeing the use of plastic tie wraps to secure the wire to the utility conduit, UV rays will deteriorate the plastic within a few years.
If it's being used to hide a splice, I would insist on getting the entire cable replaced by the telephone company. |
|
  Bicephale
join:2005-09-24
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Hi,
You're quite right to mention the nylon tie wraps, thanks for bringing this detail to my attention!!!

Now i know for sure that someone must have climbed up there much later than thirty-some years ago! I wonder if Bell would agree to insert an NID before the nuisances take place: e.g. on the roof, using only the wealthy section which remains once all of questionable items (like exposure to AC noise thru PVC tubing or the possible moisture-related shunt) have been excluded... This is called day dreaming but should i happen to be around the next time one of Bell's employees gets here i'll insist that all this trash got to be fixed before i let him enter: there's no point taking measures in hope he can go away with it while predenting that the rest is OK! |
|
  DKS Damn Kidney Stones Premium,ExMod 2002 join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON clubs:
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to ArthurS said by ArthurS :Looking back at earlier pictures, I don't like seeing the use of plastic tie wraps to secure the wire to the utility conduit, UV rays will deteriorate the plastic within a few years. Interesting. The Ilsco brand ties I have aree UV resistant. The ties were installed in direct sunlight five years ago on my satellite dish and they are still strong and flexible. |
|