Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Gives AT&T What They Want » I'm shocked, just shocked I say
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Yay monopoly  
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to nasadude
Re: I'm shocked, just shocked I say

said by nasadude See Profile :

Ok, let's just cut to the chase. It looks like I'm not going to convince you and you certainly aren't going to convince me.

The fact is, the U.S. broadband market IS NOT COMPETITIVE.
Fair enough...we'll agree to disagree because I'd say that the U.S broadband market is competitive.

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by openbox9 See Profile :

Fair enough...we'll agree to disagree because I'd say that the U.S broadband market is competitive.
how many choices of broadband provider do you have?

I have ONE choice, comcast. I live a few miles outside the DC metro beltway in Maryland, in a densely populated area.

FYI, Maryland population density was ranked 5th highest in the nation in 2006.

you obviously must have several choices of broadband provider.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

said by nasadude See Profile :

how many choices of broadband provider do you have?
I live in southern Alabama the Florida Panhandle between Pensacola and Fort Walton Beach...definitely not a metropolis. For consumer broadband, I have cable, DSL, cellular (Verizon, Sprint, AT&T), WISP, and satellite.

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by openbox9 See Profile :

said by nasadude See Profile :

how many choices of broadband provider do you have?
I live in southern Alabama the Florida Panhandle between Pensacola and Fort Walton Beach...definitely not a metropolis. For consumer broadband, I have cable, DSL, cellular (Verizon, Sprint, AT&T), WISP, and satellite.
satellite and cellular are not substitutes for DSL and cable; WISP may be, depending on speeds and reliability.

I am in a monopoly area, you are basically in a duopoly area. At least you have one more choice than I do.

The FCC and the ILECs love for people to equate cellular broadband, BPL, satellite, etc. for direct competition with wireline broadband. They aren't; direct competition would be another wireline (or 700Mhz) competitor.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

said by nasadude See Profile :

satellite and cellular are not substitutes for DSL and cable
For a vast majority of consumers, they are substitutes. The biggest issue with satellite and cellular right now are cost...but then again you can say the same thing about DSL's dial tone requirement and cable's expensiveness.
said by nasadude See Profile :

I am in a monopoly area, you are basically in a duopoly area. At least you have one more choice than I do.
I am not in a duopoly.
said by nasadude See Profile :

direct competition would be another wireline (or 700Mhz) competitor.
Don't limit your options. Competition exists, and is growing. BTW, your 700 MHz isn't the panacea that everyone seems to think that it's going to be.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

reply to nasadude
Let's take this argument one step further... How much of the backbone ISN'T provided by AT&T, Qwest, or Verizon? At some point, even the cable companies were buying services from a telco provider. In the long run, part of the cable subscriber's money was winding up in the pockets of the bell.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..."

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
So?

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
So.. what? Enlighten us on on your "so"... Don't know how to respond.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
I was commenting on your statement about telecoms owning and managing portions of the internet backbone. I didn't see the relevance.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

You said: "Fair enough...we'll agree to disagree because I'd say that the U.S broadband market is competitive."

The market is not really competitive when the majority of the data still travels over the same two or three people's lines, who in turn, make the rules and set the prices.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..."

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Are we not talking about consumer service? Consumers are far removed from the backbone and I don't think your rules and prices are that relevant. If you really want to go to the level you're talking about, don't forget about the companies providing electricity, router/switch manufactures, copper/fiber manufactures, unions and wage earners, etc, all "controlling" costs to consumers way down the path.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

Electricity providers are regulated. Router/Switch manufacturers have PLENTY of competition and those providers have choices, same with copper and fiber manufacturers. Unions and wage earners are a non-starter in this picture as well... but, something that is controlled and was once regulated and split up over this very issue has been allowed to reform and regroup and here we are...
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..."

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Telecom providers are regulated as well. So are cablecos. Router/Switch manufacturers have about as much serious competition on internet backbones as what your consumer broadband service providers do. Why are unions and wage earners non-starters? You can't seriously believe that unions don't drive up costs of products being sold can you? The "New AT&T" is not the same as the old AT&T and like I initially mentioned is still regulated.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

Unions? You're talking about items that drive up costs.. and I'm talking about an industry or corporation holding people to pay what ever they want.. two different things.

Cable TV, so you know, isn't regulated. The only thing that has a rule is on the lowest tier of service.

I'm sorry to say, but your last message really shows that you don't have much experience in the industry so we'll leave it at that and end this here.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..."
Forums » FCC Gives AT&T What They Want« Yay monopoly  


Friday, 04-Dec 14:17:11 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [117] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [99] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [76] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· An Excellent Guide About Google Voice And Sip Sorcery [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]