81399672
Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
| reply to JSRoman
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ...
said by JSRoman  :said by 81399672 :If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments Should I assume that you work for a law firm since you are always wanting to take someone to court or sue? If you actually read my comments you would see that i do not always say sue or take them to court. Also i say it in general way when i say sue etc, tch is always anit consumer, and pro business etc. |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL | Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ...
In my world...all "miffed aol users" shall be treated equal, and have all of the rights granted by the constitution!
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
satellite68
join:2007-04-11
Louisville, KY | reply to Anon
If it's so offensive to you, why post at all? |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL | reply to 81399672
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ...
Whats wrong with being pro-business?
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
81399672
Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
| said by S_engineer :Whats wrong with being pro-business? Nothing!!, except when you are totally pro business and not objective about it |
|
quatrix
Premium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
| reply to 81399672
said by 81399672 :Also i say it in general way when i say sue etc, tch is always anit consumer, and pro business etc. Anti-crime and anti-theft doesn't mean anti-consumer. |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
 ·Comcast
| reply to 81399672
Nothing he said made him non-objective....he made a point about this entitlement attitude that alot of people carry nowadays. There was nothing in his response that should have been deleted or to make him look non-objective.
By censoring his position...who looks non-objective now?
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
hopeflicker
Capitalism breeds greed
Premium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
| reply to S_engineer
said by S_engineer :Whats wrong with being pro-business? pro business = corruption = greed = less power
--
People pray to God because they're told to. |
|
checkthis
@cox.net
| reply to S_engineer
said by S_engineer :Whats wrong with being pro-business? Because "pro-business" often turns into "anti-consumer". So much of what business wants is not good for the consumer. Supporting that means you would be supporting hurting the consumer.
Sometimes the interests of the consumer and the business are the same, most of the time they are not.
Of course, in the case of this article... The consumer is an idiot. ISPs have never forwarded mail and if the so called "business person" in the story had a clue, they would have purchased email hosting with a domain. |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL | reply to hopeflicker
antibusiness=hand outs=socialism=no power
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
hopeflicker
Capitalism breeds greed
Premium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
| reply to checkthis
said by checkthis :said by S_engineer :Whats wrong with being pro-business? Because "pro-business" often turns into "anti-consumer". So much of what business wants is not good for the consumer. Supporting that means you would be supporting hurting the consumer. Sometimes the interests of the consumer and the business are the same, most of the time they are not. Of course, in the case of this article... The consumer is an idiot. ISPs have never forwarded mail and if the so called "business person" in the story had a clue, they would have purchased email hosting with a domain. well said
--
People pray to God because they're told to. |
|
hopeflicker
Capitalism breeds greed
Premium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
| reply to S_engineer
said by S_engineer :antibusiness=hand outs=socialism=no power you can be anti business and not expect handouts.
Dont know where you got that from.
Do you really equate anti-business to socialism?
--
People pray to God because they're told to. |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL | you can be anti business and not expect handouts.
Dont know where you got that from.
Why would you want to be anti business?
These are the people that EMPLOY! |
|
GeekJedi
RF is Good For You
Premium
join:2001-06-21
Mukwonago, WI
clubs:
 ·CenturyLink
 ·VOIPo
·Vonage
·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | reply to hopeflicker
said by hopeflicker :said by S_engineer :antibusiness=hand outs=socialism=no power you can be anti business and not expect handouts. Dont know where you got that from. Do you really equate anti-business to socialism? Just like you can be pro-business and not corrupt and greedy.
It goes both ways.
--
The goal of the broadcast engineer is to get all the meters on the transmitter to go as far to the right as possible!! |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL | And all of this started with a "Miffed AOL user"...geez
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
maartena
Stacked.
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to hopeflicker
said by hopeflicker :Do you really equate anti-business to socialism? I would suggest you read "Das Kapital" by Karl Marx, (Capital in English) and then re-evaluate this statement.
It's TOUGH to read though, and very boring.....
--
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" -
Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father. |
|
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| said by maartena :It's TOUGH to read though, and very boring..... I always recommend it. It is best to know your enemy.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to 81399672
said by 81399672 :said by JSRoman :said by 81399672 :If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments Should I assume that you work for a law firm since you are always wanting to take someone to court or sue? If you actually read my comments you would see that i do not always say sue or take them to court. Also i say it in general way when i say sue etc, tch is always anit consumer, and pro business etc. And you are always anti-business and pro government intrusion. I have to agree with the others. People around here assume that when you take a stance, you must be in their back pocket. That can't be any further from the truth.
Why take everything into the court or to DC? What happens if I don't like someone's Christmas decorations, should I always run to the government and petition them to stop it?
EVERYONE is not going to always agree - EVER. But, simply because we don't agree doesn't give us the right to sue or petition or legalize/or illegalize everything to get our own way.
In this story at hand, this is a pure example of 1) a possible mistake, 2) poor planning on the part of the AOL customer, 3) see #2.
Personal responsibility is at play here.
ANYONE who says email is the sole conduit for their business is a fool for a business owner. Her email couldn't have been THAT important to her in the first place. How long was it down for? If it's so important, she would have been sitting on that email all day long checking it. When it went down, why didn't she contact AOL?
ANYONE that has ever had AOL knows one thing - if your service is discontinued, all you have to do is simply sign back in and it will ask you to re-activate your account.
How could this person have lost so much revenue? Was it down for days? Then her email couldn't have been that important - I would have had it back up and running quickly. Or, she really doesn't use her email that much, the business is failing and she is looking for another revenue source ...
This story reminds me of the handicap person that goes up and down a street in their wheelchair looking for businesses with out handicap accessible restrooms and then suing them for damages... businesses that they never even patronize in the first place.
Forwarding email is simple... keep the account active for a few months longer and then tell everyone. Why should an ISP have to burden the cost of the forwarding anyway? Most people here should know that there are a lot of wasted resourced on the part of ISPs with user account email boxes sitting at MAX quota because boxes are created, never used, and then fill up taking up disk space.
I agree with TCH - if you are running a business, get a domain and own your own services.. it's under $100 a month AND it is FAR more professional than doing business as "@AOL.COM" , "Yahoo" or "Hotmail" - to which I would NEVER do business with those people anyway.. it tends to lend to their abilities in the first place.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..." |
|
