mglunt
join:2001-09-10
Fredericksburg, VA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to nutcr0cker
Re: Justified Government Action
That's what you learn by just reading the headlines. If you actually read the story (well a non biased one) you would learn that Bush Vetoed an expansion of the current program. An expansion that would make families earning up to 80K eligible for the free health care, and able to cover "children" up to 25 yrs old.
Oh, and I ain't rich, but the Tax cut sure benefited my family. |
|
joker5656
join:2006-06-23
Dallas, GA
 ·Charter Pipeline
1 edit | free health care, you want free health care???? i have to laugh at that, the government will raise taxes to cover the so called free health care. Not only that the gov. can't even enforce laws already on the books as it is let alone run itself and you want free health care lololololololol!!!!!!!! |
|
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
 ·magicjack.com
| said by joker5656  :free health care, you want free health care???? i have to laugh at that, the government will raise taxes Then it won't be free. Just paid for differently. The problem with the health care debate is that it's framed like "free markets" against "socialism." This is a faulty starting point. The health care system has nothing in common with pure, raw free markets. It is essentially a state-sponsored monopoly.
You can't become a doctor without attending medical school. You can't attend a medical school unless it has been certified/accredited by the medical profession. This creates an environment that artificially limits the number of doctors (and competition). It's not like you can open your own medical school to compete with the other medical schools, adding to the supply of doctors.
Same thing for drugs. You don't have a truly free-market choice of the drugs you can buy. It's so socially regulated (for the sake of quality) that it eliminates a huge swath of willing buyers and sellers.
So, we're not really talking about whether medicine should be socialized. It already is. We're just talking about whether the benefit of this socialization should be more equitable, and perhaps paid for differently.
For those who argue against socialization, they should be arguing against the monopoly that exists. What I've observed is that people who can afford the monopoly don't mind it. It's only when they can't afford it that they wish they had more choices which the monopoly prohibits. Or, they wish the monopoly had more responsibility to the society that created the monopoly.
Mark |
|
EngineerDave
join:2001-08-27
Hattiesburg, MS
| For Americans who are generally healty (not terminally ill), the HSA (Healthcare Savings Account) will introduce competition into the healthcare industry because people will actually see what they are being charged. When you go to a hospital and get charged $9 for a Tylenol pill you will make a fuss! The current problem is that people aren't aware of what they are really being charged. They just pay the co-pay and go on their way.
.....and the cablco exclusive contracts suck too.  |
|
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com
| said by EngineerDave :charged $9 for a Tylenol pill you will make a fuss! I have an HSA. I stand in the express lane at the grocery store trying to get $1 off Pseudafed. "A guy down the street sell's it for $3. Will you take $3.50? Come on, haggle with me! (Monty Python voice)"
I have mixed feelings about HSA. I agree with you that inducing customer revolt (which is really the positive you're pointing out) is good. But, it's like trying to boil the ocean. The medical profession is essentially a monopoly. Only a limited number of people can enter the profession due to the tightly controlled number of medical schools with limited seats. There's no way to freely allow supply to match demand.
I'm not arguing against the level of quality we have socially forced upon this market. Just saying that it *is* socially forced. I don't think most people who repeat partisan comments for and against socialized medicine understand the position we're starting from. It's *far* from a so-called free market.
said by EngineerDave :They just pay the co-pay and go on their way. Worse, they pay amounts above the network-negotiated price. I don't go to the doctor often. But most times they've sent me a bill for what the plan didn't pay. I call and ask why they're exceeding the negotiated price. They quickly say "that was a billing mistake." I bet they only have that repeated billing mistake because a significant percentage of clients pay.
Mark |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| reply to amigo_boy
said by amigo_boy :The problem with the health care debate is that it's framed like "free markets" against "socialism." This is a faulty starting point. The health care system has nothing in common with pure, raw free markets. It is essentially a state-sponsored monopoly. Can you get an Amen! ANYTIME people talk about reforms or regulations immediately the "Socialism!" schtick comes out... As if the health care system, our Energy companies, or Big Telecom etc etc have anything to "Free Market Enterprise".
You always see "Free Market!" used as the "defense" to do nothing to solve the problems.
These aren't "Socialism" vs "Free-Market" issues... yet any suggestion of change and the debate is immediately framed that way by those who want to keep things how they are now.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
TheRogueX
join:2003-03-26
Springfield, MO
·Mediacom
| Best part is... I wouldn't want a totally 'Free-Market.' Have you ever read stuff about what that would be? I wouldn't want to live in that nightmare.
It's funny, also.. Free Market capitalism is an idea straight out of Liberalism (at least, from the REAL meaning of the term), but the people who espouse is call themselves staunch conservatives.
lol |
|
