 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4
1 edit | Ilec enforcing abuse rules against Clecs Sounds like Bell Sympatico(like a U.S. Ilec) is trying to enforce their abuse rules on the Canadian equivalent of any Clecs using their infrastructure. I'll bet this goes to the courts pretty quickly. |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Ilec enforcing abuse rules aaginst Clecs Well, then again, it is Canada.
With the Canadian dollar being very high against the U.S., pricing on bandwidth should be dropping.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
|
|
| reply to Romney2012
Re: Ilec enforcing abuse rules against Clecs This was all stated in this article:
»www.p2pnet.net/story/13883 |
|
 SnickerdoPremium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON | reply to Romney2012
said by Romney2012:Sounds like Bell Sympatico(like a U.S. Ilec) is trying to enforce their abuse rules on the Canadian equivalent of any Clecs using their infrastructure. I'll bet this goes to the courts pretty quickly. The CRTC will stop Bell from refusing to service specific addresses to third-party ISPs dead in their tracks. Bell will most certainly not be allowed to do this for very long, if at all. The CRTC and Bell aren't exactly on friendly terms, you can bet that the CRTC has just been waiting for the moment to lay some smackdown.
As for the connection between the DSLAM and the ISP, the ISP pays for them, not Bell. The ISP can also choose whether they use Ethernet or ATM, and the different levels of DSLAM connectivity are priced accordingly. Bell can't justify refusing access based on this, because it's the ISPs who are paying for the access and having to deal with the congestion.
--
I swear that I will faithfully and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen. |
|
| reply to en102
Re: Ilec enforcing abuse rules aaginst Clecs I've been trying to tell them this all along. But the shills dream up some spiel of cockamamie malarkey to try to make it sound like i don't know what i'm talking about when in fact the converse is true. |
|
yabos
join:2003-02-16
London, ON | reply to en102
Well, I agree that the 1.50/GB is a cash grab. The bandwidth from Canadian ISPs isn't an import. It's not like we're importing GBs from the states. |
|
