 moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| And here we go again......
Once again, Verizon thinks it is better to get into the news with their stupidity and not fix a problem they caused themselves.
The $58,000 bill is chump change compared to the massive legal bill they will receive from their own lawyers not to mention the enormous bad reputation and black eye from how they dealt with this case.
Unless they can truly argue dollars and cents, they better suck it up and pay this one quickly. |
|
 BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast
| said by moonpuppy :Once again, Verizon thinks it is better to get into the news with their stupidity and not fix a problem they caused themselves. The $58,000 bill is chump change compared to the massive legal bill they will receive from their own lawyers not to mention the enormous bad reputation and black eye from how they dealt with this case. Unless they can truly argue dollars and cents, they better suck it up and pay this one quickly. Never worked at a big company have you ? Verizon has it's own legal time as does many huge corporations. And they can afford to pay the best , which is why going to court really costs them next to nothing. Since everything the lawyer uses is tax deduction. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
 moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD | I used to work for a large DOD contractor and a theater company. Both were more interested in settlement than in bad publicity. |
|
  AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß | reply to moonpuppy Most council is in house and being paid anyway. So why not use them. In the end if they burn down a couple houses, do you REALLY think that is going to stop people from buying the service....no. |
|