VTBrendan
Viatalk
Premium,VIP
join:2005-06-27
Clifton Park, NY
| reply to dipswich
Re: Fax to Email Service - Opinions Wanted
The setup we have does not require a virtual number - you will have an option in your control panel to enable the feature. Once its enabled, all faxes coming into your main VT line are detected and redirected to our fax to email system.
-Brendan |
|
dipswich
Premium
join:2003-06-27
Raleigh, NC
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·VoicePulse for Bus..
·ViaTalk
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| said by VTBrendan  :...all faxes coming into your main VT line are detected and redirected to our fax to email system. That's elegant. I would still want the option to add it as a virtual number only (or selected numbers only) so that I don't have to publish a main number as a FAX line. I'm not willing to risk the possible annoyances with publishing a main number as a FAX number. |
|
dcurrey
Premium
join:2004-06-29
·ViaTalk
| reply to VTBrendan
said by VTBrendan :The setup we have does not require a virtual number - you will have an option in your control panel to enable the feature. Once its enabled, all faxes coming into your main VT line are detected and redirected to our fax to email system. -Brendan Thats pretty cool. Was wondering how you would be able to do it without adding a number thus requiring at least a minimum monthly charge.
Guess my per fax price would work. Think it would be easier to sell them in blocks in advance instead of billing 1 at a time. |
|
VTBrendan
Viatalk
Premium,VIP
join:2005-06-27
Clifton Park, NY
| reply to dipswich
Hi,
This will work with our Virtual Numbers as well, so if you didn't want to publish your main number as a fax number, you can simply add a V-Number and publish that instead. The difference in could would be that of adding a V-Number. We're doing it this way to keep overhead as low as possible, as we want this to be a cheap enough solution that its viable for home users w/light usage, as well as the more obvious target of business customers.
-Brendan |
|
VTBrendan
Viatalk
Premium,VIP
join:2005-06-27
Clifton Park, NY | Currently, we're leaning towards a small monthly charge (few bucks) that includes X number of faxes, and then allow upgrades from there.
-Brendan |
|
dipswich
Premium
join:2003-06-27
Raleigh, NC
·AT&T U-Verse
·VoicePulse for Bus..
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
| For a breakage-based monthly fee, $1.95 would be my limit.
For the truly occasional recipient, a few months of a fee makes it a rather expensive convenience option. As a compromise, maybe a minimum fee in months when a fax is received is an option? That, in conjunction with an "approved senders" list could keep it affordable.
I assume blacklisting, for when I'm not shopping for Disney vacations, works with incoming FAX, too. |
|
Boolah
join:2003-11-08
| reply to VTBrendan
It would seem to make more sense to get a CallCentric DID for $1.95/month + $2.37 E911 fee and $0.015/min. The Fax Reception feature is free with all of their accounts. If you presume that you can receive one page in one minute, you could receive 45 pages per month, have your own DID and pay the E911 fee for $5.00/month. |
|
CyberSultan
Premium
join:2006-07-20
| reply to dipswich
said by dipswich :I assume blacklisting, for when I'm not shopping for Disney vacations, works with incoming FAX, too. I would assume that incoming fax calls would also be affected appropriately by the custom call routing feature of the VT service. I would want to avoid paying for faxes from spammers. |
|
VTBrendan
Viatalk
Premium,VIP
join:2005-06-27
Clifton Park, NY
| We're looking at it this way...
For the occasional faxer, a 2nd number is not necessarily something they would need or want if it would in fact increase the cost of the plan.
For a business, if a 2nd number is necessary, the $4 for the number most likely wouldn't be a show-stopping fee.
-Brendan |
|
